考虑供应中断的供应链稳定性和产量决策模型
武汉纺织大学, 管理学院, 湖北武汉 430300
| 摘 要： | 随着供应链中断风险的日益暴露，中断管理作为一个重要的研究课题，近年来引起了学者们的广泛关注，而通过回收再制造缓解制造商供应中断问题的有效方法之一却被忽视。对制造商来说，再制造商可以提供再制造产品、帮助缓解生产压力、赢得优势，领先同行。消费者作为供应链的需求端和产品的最终体验者，其是否愿意支付更高的费用帮助制造商渡过难关，这将影响到制造商是否盈利。基于以上背景，计划针对上游供应商供应中断的问题，通过构建供应商和再制造商的博弈模型系统分析了两方主体的最优策略选择。然后通过数值仿真分析，讨论各主体的最优策略。结果表明，原制造商需努力提升自身稳定性，满足市场需求；再制造商实现盈利后可以发展新产品的开发，提高自身竞争力的同时实现长久盈利；对于消费者来说，支持再制造，可以减少碳排放，实现资源的有效利用。 |
| 关 键 词： | 供应中断; 供应链稳定性; 产量决策; Stackelberg博弈 |
| DOI： | 10.57237/j.wjmst.2023.03.002 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2023-06-10
接受日期: 2023-07-14
在线出版日期: 2023-10-09
Supply Chain Stability and Output Decision Model Considering Supply Disruption
School of Management, Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan 430300, China
| Abstract: | With the increasing exposure of supply chain disruption risk, disruption management, as an important research topic, has attracted extensive attention of scholars in recent years, while one of the effective methods to alleviate the supply disruption problem of manufacturers through recycling and remanufacturing has been ignored. For manufacturers, remanufacturing can provide relief of production pressure, win advantages and lead the industry. As the demand-side of the supply chain and the final experience of the product, whether consumers are willing to pay higher fees to help manufacturers overcome difficulties will affect whether manufacturers are profitable. Based on the above background, the plan aims at the problem of supply disruption of upstream suppliers, and systematically analyzes the optimal strategy choice of the two parties by constructing a game model of suppliers and remanufacturers. Then, through numerical simulation analysis, the optimal strategy of each agent is discussed. The results show that the original manufacturers should strive to improve their stability and meet the market demand; Remanufacturers can develop new product development after making profits, improve their competitiveness and achieve long-term profits at the same time; For consumers, supporting remanufacturing can reduce carbon emissions and achieve effective use of resources. |
| Keywords: | Supply Interruption; Supply Chain Stability; Yield Decision; Stackelberg Game |
参考文献
| [1] | 王海军, 张瑞娜, 郭羽洪, 杨明. 零售商补贴对供应链可靠性协调策略影响研究 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2021, 35(04): 190-201. |
| [2] | 曹柬, 张梅美, 许佳阳, 朱晨波,周根贵. 竞争环境下针对双寡头回收处理商的政府激励机制设计 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(05): 114-121. |
| [3] | 楼振凯, 楼旭明, 侯福均. 考虑政府补贴的新产品与再制造产品定价模型 [J]. 控制与决策, 2022, 37(01): 196-204. |
| [4] | Huang Y, Liang Y. Exploring the strategies of online and offline recycling channels in closed-loop supply chain under government subsidy [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2021, 29(15): 21591-21602. |
| [5] | Li J M, Qiang Q, Zu Q H, Bao Y Z, Yu X Y. Optimal Pricing Strategy and Government Consumption Subsidy Policy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Third-Party Remanufacturer [J]. Sustainability, 2020, 12(6): 2411. |
| [6] | Kazi S S, Abdullahil A, Syed M A, M d, Abdul M. A supply chain disruption risk mitigation model to manage COVID-19 pandemic risk [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021: 1-16. |
| [7] | 孔进, 李芳. 供应中断风险下原制造商应对策略研究 [J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2021, 43(04): 409-420. |
| [8] | Tsao Y C, Thanh V V, Chang Y Y, Wei H H. COVID-19: Government subsidy models for sustainable energy supply with disruption risks [J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 150: 111425-111425. |
| [9] | Xiao H, Zhi H, Wen P. Using evolutionary game theory to study governments and logistics companies’ strategies for avoiding broken cold chains [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2020: 1-29. |
| [10] | Milad B, Christopher W. Zobel. Assessing the extended impacts of supply chain disruptions on firms: An empirical study [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021, 231: 107862. |
| [11] | 熊峰, 彭健, 金鹏等. 生鲜农产品供应链关系契约稳定性影响研究——以冷链设施补贴模式为视角 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(8): 102-111. |
| [12] | Lou Z K, Lou X M, Dai X Z. Game-theoretic models of green products in a two-echelon dual-channel supply chain under government subsidies [J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2425401. |
| [13] | Veysey S. Majority of companies suffered supply chain disruption in 2011: Survey [J]. Business Insurance, 2011, 8(3): 20-29. |
| [14] | Sammi Y. T, Haresh G, Diwakar G. Managing disruptions in decentralized supply chains with endogenous supply process reliability [J]. Production and Operations Management, 2014, 23(7): 1198-1211. |
| [15] | Saurabh A, Jennifer B, Scott G. Firm's resilience to supply chain disruptions: Scale development and empirical examination [J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2015, 33(4): 111-122. |
| [16] | 崔春晓, 王凯, 王学真. 消费者对可追溯猪肉支付意愿的影响因素研究 [J]. 统计与决策, 2016(12): 98-101. |
| [17] | Lu C, Huang W, Cheng H. Comparative analysis of government subsidy policies in a dynamic green supply chain considering consumers preference [J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(21): 11601-11601. |
| [18] | Alsubhi M, Blake M, Nguyen T, Majmudar I, Moodie M, Ananthapavan J. Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review [J]. Obesity reviews, 2022: 13525-13525. |
| [19] | Zhang H, Bai X F, Ma Z G. Consumer reactions to AI design: Exploring consumer willingness to pay for AI-designed products [J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2022, 39(11): 2171-2183. |
| [20] | Smetana K, Melstrom R T., Malone T. A Meta-Regression Analysis of Consumer Willingness to Pay for Aquaculture Products [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 2022, 54(3): 480-495. |
| [21] | Hossain A, Badiuzzaman, Nielsen M, Roth Eva. Consumer willingness to pay for quality attributes of pangasius in Bangladesh: A hedonic price analysis [J]. Aquaculture, 2022, 555. |
| [22] | Nascimento G C, da C M J L, Athie T S, Silva J d S, Reis E A, Almeida B C C, Godman B, Godói I P D. Acceptability and Consumer Willingness to pay for a hypothetical HIV vaccine in Northern Brazil: A cross-sectional study and the implications [J]. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 2022, 21(2): 145-166. |
| [23] | Canarslan Ö N, Bariş G. Flow Experience and Consumer Willingness to Pay in Online Mass Customization Processes [J]. International Journal of Online Marketing (IJOM), 2021, 12(1): 1-21. |
| [24] | Zhang X M, Yin H T, Zhao R. Consumer willingness to pay for eco-labels in China: A choice experiment approach [J]. Journal of Management Analytics, 2021, 8(4): 673-692. |
| [25] | Oluoch Sydney, Lal Pankaj, Bevacqua Anthony, Wolde Bernabas. Consumer willingness to pay for community solar in New Jersey [J]. The Electricity Journal, 2021, 34(8). |
| [26] | Morone P, Caferra R, D’Adamo I, Falcone P M, Imbert E, Morone A. Consumer willingness to pay for bio-based products: Do certifications matter? [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2021: 108248-108248. |
| [27] | Kimberly L J, Karen L D, Mackenzie B G, David W H. Consumer willingness to pay for locally produced hard cider in the USA [J]. International Journal of Wine Business Research, 2021, 33(3): 411-431. |
| [28] | Athie T S, Nascimento G C, Labis d C M J, Sales S J d, Reis E A, Martin A P, Godman B, Dias G I P. Consumer willingness to pay for a hypothetical Chagas disease vaccine in Brazil: a cross-sectional study and the implications [J]. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 2021, 0(0). |
| [29] | Lai Y F, Yue C Y. Consumer Willingness to Pay for Organic and Animal Welfare Product Attributes: Do Experimental Results Align with Market Data? [J]. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2020, 45(3): 462-483. |
| [30] | 张旭梅, 李梦丽, 但斌等.考虑异质消费者的线下到线上供应链合作广告契约设计 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2021(1): 1-11. |
| [31] | Zhan J T, Ma Y B, Deng P C, Li Y Q, Xu M, Xiong H. Designing enhanced labeling information to increase consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified foods [J]. British Food Journal, 2020, 123(1): 405-418. |
| [32] | Otieno D J, Ogutu S O. Consumer willingness to pay for chicken welfare attributes in Kenya [J]. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing, 2020, 32(4): 379-402. |
| [33] | 徐滨士. 再制造与循环经济 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2007. |
| [34] | Giuntini R, Gaudette K. Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity [J]. Business Horizons, 2003(6): 41-48. |
