1. 泰国暹罗大学, 全球创新中心, 曼谷 10160
2. 百色学院, 创新创业学院, 广西百色 533000
| 摘 要: | 本文根据高层梯队理论,委托代理理论和技术创新理论,从企业文化及精细化管理角度出发,以“高管团队创新意识影响创新绩效”为研究思路,通过激励机制手段激发高管团队创新意识最终导致创新绩效的提升而优化激励机制,使其对创新绩效发挥更有效的作用提出概念模型和研究假设。本文为定量研究,首先,根据文献研究发现高管团队创新意识是由重视程度和支持程度构成,然后探索高管团队创新意识、员工创新行为、激励机制和企业绩效四个维度间的关系,借鉴成熟量表,编制调查问卷;研究对象为高新企业高层管理人员,通过机构以及个人进行发放;最后,将收集回来的135份样本数据采用SPSS软件进行分析,以及假设检验。本研究的实证结果表明:(1)高管团队创新意识对创新绩效有正向影响;(2)员工创新行为对创新绩效有正向影响(3)高管团队创新意识对员工创新行为有正向影响(4)员工创新行为在高管团队创新意识和创新绩效关系之间起中介作用;(5)激励机制在高管团队创新意识和员工创新行为关系之间起调节作用。 |
| 关 键 词: | 高新技术企业; 高管团队创新意识; 激励机制; 创新绩效; 员工创新行为 |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.wjmst.2023.01.001 |
1. Office of Siam Global Innovation Academy, Siam University, Bangkok 10160, Thailand
2. Department of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Baise University, Baise 533000, China
| Abstract: | Based on the high-level echelon theory, principal-agent theory, and technological innovation theory, this paper starts from the perspective of corporate culture and refined management, takes "the innovation consciousness of the TMT (Top Management Team) affects innovation performance" as the research idea, and stimulates the innovation consciousness of the TMT through the incentive mechanism. It leads to improving innovation performance and optimizing the incentive mechanism, so that it can play a more effective role in innovation performance, putting forward conceptual models and research hypotheses. This paper is quantitative research. First, according to literature research, it is found that the innovation awareness of the TMT is composed of the degree of emphasis and support, and then explores the relationship among the four dimensions of innovation awareness of the TMT, employee innovation behavior, incentive mechanism and corporate performance. Mature scales and questionnaires were compiled; the research objects were senior managers of high-tech enterprises, which were distributed through institutions and individuals; finally, the collected 135 sample data were analyzed with SPSS software and hypothesis testing. The empirical results of this study show that: (1) The innovation consciousness of the TMT has a positive impact on innovation performance; (2) The innovation behavior of employees has a positive impact on innovation performance; (4) Employee innovation behavior plays a mediating role between the relationship between top management team innovation consciousness and innovation performance; (5) Incentive mechanism plays a moderating role between top management team innovation consciousness and employee innovation behavior. |
| Keywords: | High-tech Enterprise; TMT Innovation Consciousness; Incentive Mechanism; Innovation Performance; Employee Innovation Behavior |
| [1] | Yuan, F., & Woodman, R. W. Innovative behavior in the workplace: The role of performance and image outcome expectations [J]. Academy of management journal, 2010. 53 (2), 323-342. |
| [2] | Hambrick, et al. "The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. " [J] Academy of Management Proceedings 1982. 1 (1982): 12-16. |
| [3] | 任桂芳. 股东与经理之间的不完全信息博弈分析 [J]. 集团经济研究, 2007. (28): 240-241. |
| [4] | DavidK. Tse. (2001). China's Transition and its Implications for International Business [J]. Journal of International Business Studies. volume 32. pages5–21. |
| [5] | Schumpeter, J. A. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle [J]. Transaction Publishers. 1982. 1, 244. Lengnick-Hall (1912-1934). |
| [6] | 蒋泰维. (2012). 浙江科技研究报告 [M]. 中国科学技术出版社. |
| [7] | Hambrick D C, Mason P A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers [J]. Academy of management review, 1984, 9 (2): 193-206. |
| [8] | 尉建文, 赵延东. 权力还是声望?——社会资本测量的争论与验证 [J]. 社会学研究, 2011 (3): 64-83. |
| [9] | 朱丽, 刘军, 刘超, 等. 异质性行业连接, 网络权力与创新绩效关系研究——基于中国上市公司全网络 [J]. 经济管理, 2017 (9): 61-70. |
| [10] | Aouad, G., Ozorhon, B. and Abbott, C. (2010), "Facilitating innovation in construction: Directions and implications for research and policy" [J], Construction Innovation, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 374-394. |
| [11] | Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior [J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 16 (1), 7-26. |
| [12] | Schollhammer, H. Internal Corporate Entrepreneurship. In: Kent, D., Sexton, L. and Vesper, K. H., Eds., Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship [J], Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1982, 209-223. |
| [13] | Waterman P. Division and unity amongst Nigerian workers: Lagos Port unionism, 1940s-60s [M]. Institute of Social Studies, Heinemann, distributors, 1982. |
| [14] | MILLER WW. Book Reviews. Work, Employment and Society. 1989;3 (1): 120-121. |
| [15] | Robbins S P, Judge T A. Essentials of organizational behavior, 81-83 [J]. 1992. |
| [16] | Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (1992). Innovation and competitive advantage: What we know and what we need to learn. Journal of management, 18 (2), 399-429. |
| [17] | 毛良虎, 姜莹. 长江经济带省域科技创新能力评价及空间关联格局分析 [J]. 科技进步与对策, 2016, 33 (21): 127-131. |
| [18] | Amabile. T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw and L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior (pp. 123-167). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. |
| [19] | West M A, Farr J L. Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives [J]. Social behaviour, 1989. |
| [20] | 刘智强, 邓传军, 廖建桥, 等. 组织支持, 地位认知与员工创新: 雇佣多样性视角 [J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18 (10): 80-94. |
| [21] | Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (7), 1139-1155. |
| [22] | Madjar N, Oldham G R, Pratt M G. There's no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees' creative performance [J]. Academy of Management journal, 2002, 45 (4): 757-767. |
| [23] | Shin S J, Zhou J. Transformational leadership, conservation, and creativity: Evidence from Korea [J]. Academy of management Journal, 2003, 46 (6): 703-714. |
| [24] | Gist M E, Mitchell T R. Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability [J]. Academy of Management review, 1992, 17 (2): 183-211. |
| [25] | 王端旭, 洪雁. 领导支持行为促进员工创造力的机理研究 [J]. 南开管理评论, 2010 (4): 109-114. |
| [26] | Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of management journal, 37 (3), 580-607. |
| [27] | Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of management review, 18 (2), 293-321. |
| [28] | 陈文沛. 领导风格对创新绩效的影响: 以创新行为为中介变量 [J]. 经济经纬, 2014, 31 (5): 93-97. |
| [29] | 弗里曼, 理查德. 劳动经济学 [J]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1987. |
| [30] | 杨春华. 中外知识型员工激励因素比较分析 [J]. 科技进步与对策, 2004, 021 (006): 168-170. |
| [31] | 张术霞, 范琳洁, 王冰. 我国企业知识型员工激励因素的实证研究 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32 (5): 144-149. |
| [32] | 马文聪, 侯羽, 朱桂龙. 研发投入和人员激励对创新绩效的影响机制——基于新兴产业和传统产业的比较研究 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2013, 34 (3): 58-68. |
| [33] | 李建钢, 李秉祥. 创新型企业成长动力机制的系统动力学解释 [J]. 科技管理研究, 2014, 34 (19): 137-140. |
| [34] | Farmer, S. M, Tierney, P & Kung-McIntyre, Kung-McIntyre, KE. Employee Creativity in Taiwan, An Application of Role Identity Theory [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46 (5), 618-630. |
| [35] | Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workpolace [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 580-607. |
| [36] | 于晓宇、蔡莉.《失败学习行为、战略决策与创业企业新绩效 [N]. 管理科学学报. 2014. 16 (12), 37~56页. |
| [37] | 刘云、石金涛. 组织创新氛围与激励偏好对员工创新行为的交互效应研究 [J]. 管理世界. 2009,(10):88-101; 114, 188. |
| [38] | Zhang, Y., &. Li, H. Innovation Search of New Ventures in A Technology Cluster: The Role of Ties with Service Intermediaries [J]. Strategic Management Journal,2020, 31 (1): 88-109. |
| [39] | 李凤莲. 对员工创新行为影响研究 [D]. 2016, 辽宁大学博士论文. |
| [40] | Baron R M, Kenny D A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations [J]. Journal of personality and social psychology, 1986, 51 (6): 1173-1178. |
| [41] | 罗胜强、姜嬿. 管理学问卷调查研究方法. [M], 2014, 重庆大学出版社. |