共享停车平台参与下的三方演化博弈策略分析
武汉科技大学, 理学院, 湖北武汉 430081
| 摘 要： | 目前共享停车已经成为解决城市“停车难”问题的主要方法之一。为了促进共享停车平台发展，推广共享停车产业，本文构建了以出行者，停车位拥有者，共享停车平台为主体的三方演化博弈模型，探讨了共享停车平台的停车收费和服务费收费标准对演化均衡的影响，对共享停车平台制定收费标准提供建议，并对模型进行了数值仿真分析。结果表明：三方主体演化策略互相影响；停车费和服务费的改变对停车位拥有者的策略选择影响较大；降低停车费收费，可以增强出行者使用共享平台的意愿，提高系统达到稳定状态的速度。根据三方的演化比例，适当增加平台收取的服务费，也能提高系统达到稳定状态的速度，最终使系统达到共享停车平台开设，出行者、停车位拥有者使用共享停车平台的演化均衡状态，促进共享停车产业良好发展。 |
| 关 键 词： | 共享停车; 三方演化博弈; 演化均衡 |
| DOI： | 10.57237/j.wjms.2023.03.001 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2023-08-22
接受日期: 2023-09-25
在线出版日期: 2023-10-09
Tripartite Evolutionary Game Analysis Under Shared Parking Platform Participation
School of Science, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081, China
| Abstract: | At present, shared parking has become one of the main ways to solve the problem of "difficult parking" in cities. In order to promote the development of shared parking platforms and promote the shared parking industry, this paper constructs a tripartite evolutionary game model with travelers, parking space owners and shared parking platforms as the main body, discusses the impact of parking fees and service fees on the evolutionary equilibrium of shared parking platforms, provides suggestions for the formulation of charging standards for shared parking platforms, and carries out numerical simulation analysis on the model. The results show that the three evolution strategies influence each other; The change of parking fee and service fee has a great influence on the strategy choice of parking space owners. Reducing parking fees can increase travelers' willingness to use the shared platform and improve the speed at which the system reaches a stable state. According to the evolution ratio of the three parties, appropriately increasing the service fee charged by the platform can also improve the speed of the system to reach a stable state, and finally make the system reach the evolutionary equilibrium state of the shared parking platform opening, travelers and parking space owners using the shared parking platform, and promote the good development of the shared parking industry. |
| Keywords: | Shared Parking; Tripartite Evolutionary Game; Evolutionary Equilibrium |
基金
| 1. | 武汉科技大学大学生创新创业计划 (编号: 2022157) |
参考文献
| [1] | 张弘. 2022年我国机动车保有量达4. 17亿辆 [N]. 人民公安报•交通安全周刊, 2023-01-13 (001). |
| [2] | 杨昆, 时燕, 罗毅等. 经济快速发展背景下中国民用汽车拥有量变化的时空特征 [J]. 地理科学, 2019, 39(04): 654-662. |
| [3] | 尹晨, 邵祖峰, 王华琴. 城市路内违章停车治理困境及路径探究 [J]. 交通企业管理, 2022, 37(05): 38-40. |
| [4] | 约翰•梅纳德•史密斯著; 潘春阳译. 演化与博弈论 [M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2008. |
| [5] | 谢识予. 经济博弈论 (第4版) [M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 2017. |
| [6] | Hanauske M, Kunz J, Bernius S and Konig W. Doves and hawks in economics revisited: An evolutionary quantum game theory based analysis of financial crises [J]. Physca A-Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2010, 389(21): 5084-5102. |
| [7] | Zhou M and Deng F Q. Evolutionary dynamics of an asymmetric game between a supplier and a retailer [J]. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2006, 4222: 466-469. |
| [8] | Liu X W, Zhang Z X, Qi W and Wang D W. An Evolutionary Game Study of the Behavioral Management of Bid Evaluations in Reserve Auctions [J]. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 95390-95402. |
| [9] | 徐玲玲, 丛雪薇. 商业银行与第三方物流合作供应链金融的演化博弈研究 [J]. 金融理论与实践, 2022, 513(04): 10-18. |
| [10] | Zhang S Y, Pardalos P M andJiang X D. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Capital-Constrained Supplier's and Manufacturer's Financing Schemes [J]. Complexity, 2021, 8875794, 1-13. |
| [11] | Li S C and Wang B. Evolutionary game simulation of corporate investing and financing behavior from a risk perspective [J]. Cluster Computing-The Journal of Networks Software Tools and Applications, 2019, 22(3): S5955-S5964. |
| [12] | 周学广, 张坚, 杜建国. 基于逆向拍卖的演化博弈分析 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18 (05): 171-178. |
| [13] | 吴文清, 赵黎明. 创业与投资的演化博弈分析与政策建议 [J]. 统计与决策, 2008, 265(13): 56-58. |
| [14] | 王先甲, 顾翠伶, 何奇龙等. 供应链金融信贷市场三方演化博弈动态 [J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(01): 30-37. |
| [15] | 贾富强, 李引珍, 杨信丰等. 基于演化博弈的政府鼓励条件下共享停车行为分析 [J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2022, 22(01): 163-170. |
| [16] | 王洪飞. 基于三方演化博弈的共享停车产业推广研究 [J]. 上海管理科学, 2020, 42(06): 107-112. |
| [17] | 王晓青, 吴梓敬. 基于多方博弈的社区停车资源共享模式探究——一个满意度优化模型 [J]. 智能城市, 2023, 9(03): 81-84. |
| [18] | 段满珍. 基于博弈论的居住区共享停车理论与方法研究 [D]. 吉林大学, 2017. |
| [19] | 孙超, 李世杰, 张鹏等. 出行系统最优配置下共享停车选择及泊位分配 [J]. 郑州大学学报 (工学版), 2023, 44(01): 38-43. |
| [20] | 龙朝党. 小城市中心区停车泊位共享容量与需求匹配策略研究 [D]. 桂林电子科技大学, 2022. |
| [21] | 陈俊坤, 刘亦婷, 谢雨俊等. 共享停车服务平台的设计 [J]. 数字技术与应用, 2023, 41(01): 153-155. |
| [22] | 樊丽娟. 中国证券市场参与人之间的博弈和演化博弈分析 [D]. 广州大学, 2008. |
| [23] | Selten R. A note on evolutionarily stable strategies in asymmetrical animal contests [J]. Journal of Theoretical Biol-ogy, 1980, 84: 93-101. |
