Design of Posterior Lumbar Fusion Internal Fixation Screws
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian 116028, China
| Abstract: | Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a classic lumbar fusion procedure in spine surgery. The internal fixation screws used in the fusion procedure are the key components that are used to fix the vertebrae to the fusion device. Based on CT slice data and human anatomy theory, the finite element model (FEM) of the L1-L5 lumbar region was reconstructed using the principle of reverse engineering. Taking the L3 segment vertebral body model as an example, the screw insertion plan during the operation was determined. Then, the finite element model of screw extraction was established using the finite element software. The fixation effect of the pedicle screw embedded in the vertebral body was discussed through the finite element analysis method and orthogonal experiments, as well as the factors influencing the fixation effect of the screw. The results show that the contact area between the internal fixation screws of intervertebral fusion surgery and the cortical bone has a significantly greater impact on the fixation strength than the contact area with the cancellous bone. Choosing screws with a higher pitch and a larger outer diameter can significantly enhance their fixation effect. After considering various influencing factors comprehensively. The preferred size of the screw is an outer diameter of 6.0 mm, a pitch of 1.75 mm, and an SSA angle of 0°. This provides a basis for the design of intervertebral fusion internal fixation screws and the insertion method. |
| Keywords: | Intervertebral Fusion; Pedicle Screw; Internal Fixation; Finite Element Analysis |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.wjcm.2025.01.002 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2025-04-27
接受日期: 2025-07-09
在线出版日期: 2025-08-01
参考文献
| [1] | Ravindra V M, Senglaub S S, Rattani A, et al. Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume [J]. Global spine journal, 2018, 8(8): 784-794. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568218770769 |
| [2] | Eliasberg C D, Kelly M P, Ajiboye R M, et al. Complications and rates of subsequent lumbar surgery following lumbar total disc arthroplasty and lumbar fusion [J]. Spine, 2016, 41(2): 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001180 |
| [3] | Mobbs R J, Phan K. History of retractor technologies for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation systems [J]. Orthopaedic surgery, 2016, 8(1): 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12216 |
| [4] | Peijie L U O. Comparison of the short-segment and long-segment cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation for osteoporotic thoracolumbar fracture: a finite element study [J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2020: 342-347. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1926 |
| [5] | Lu P, Pan T, Dai T, et al. Is unilateral pedicle screw fixation superior than bilateral pedicle screw fixation for lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2018, 13: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1004-x |
| [6] | Blizzard D J, Thomas J A. MIS single-position lateral and oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion and bilateral pedicle screw fixation: feasibility and perioperative results [J]. Spine, 2018, 43(6): 440-446. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002330 |
| [7] | Lv Q B, Gao X, Pan X X, et al. Biomechanical properties of novel transpedicular transdiscal screw fixation with interbody arthrodesis technique in lumbar spine: a finite element study [J]. Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2018, 15: 50-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jot.2018.08.005 |
| [8] | Li X, Abdel-Latif K H A, Schwab J, et al. Biomechanical impact of cortical bone vs. traditional pedicle screw trajectories: a finite element study on lumbar spinal instrumentation [J]. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 2025, 13: 1541114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1541114 |
| [9] | Wu L, Jiang X, Guan T, et al. Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation, [J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(19): e38929-e38929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38929 |
| [10] | Ding H, Liao L, Yan P, et al. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of L4-5 Degenerative Lumbar Disc Traction under Different Pushing Heights [J]. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2021, 2021(1): 1322397. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/1322397 |
| [11] | Huang S F, Chang C M, Liao C Y, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of an osteoporotic anatomical 3D printed posterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with internal lattice design based on weighted topology optimization [J]. International Journal of Bioprinting, 2023, 9(3): 697. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.697 |
| [12] | Kahaer A, Zhang R, Wang Y, et al. Hybrid pedicle screw and modified cortical bone trajectory technique in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 segment: finite element analysis [J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2023, 24(1): 288. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06385-y |
| [13] | Fan W, Guo L X, Zhang M. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems [J]. European Spine Journal, 2021, 30(8): 2342-2350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06856-7 |
| [14] | Hangkai S, Yuru C, Zhenhua L, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with various fixation options: Finite element analysis of static and vibration conditions [J]. Clinical Biomechanics, 2021, 84: 105339-105339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105339 |
| [15] | Zhang Q, Chon T E, Zhang Y, et al. Finite element analysis of the lumbar spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis subjected to different loads [J]. Computers in biology and medicine, 2021, 136: 104745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104745 |
| [16] | Yamamoto I, Panjabi M M, Crisco T, et al. Three-dimensional movements of the whole lumbar spine and lumbosacral joint [J]. Spine, 1989, 14(11): 1256-1260. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198911000-00020 |
| [17] | Chen C S, Cheng C K, Liu C L, et al. Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine [J]. Medical engineering & physics, 2001, 23(7): 485-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00076-5 |
| [18] | Tsai Y Y, Hsieh M K, Lai P L, et al. Predicting pullout strength of pedicle screws in broken bones from X-ray images [J]. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 2022, 134: 105366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105366 |
| [19] | Doğu H. The Optimal Entry Point and Trajectory for Pedicle Screws to Avoid Superior Facet Joint Violation and Pedicle Penetration [J]. Cureus, 2024, 16(10). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.72719 |
| [20] | Raasck K, Khoury J, Aoude A, et al. The effect of thoracolumbar pedicle isthmus on pedicle screw accuracy [J]. Global Spine Journal, 2020, 10(4): 393-398. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568219850143 |
| [21] | El-Rich M, Arnoux P J, Wagnac E, et al. Finite element investigation of the loading rate effect on the spinal load-sharing changes under impact conditions [J]. Journal of biomechanics, 2009, 42(9): 1252-1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.036 |
| [22] | Hang Z Q, Huat T S, Meng C S. Effects of bone materials on the screw pull-out strength in human spine [J]. Medical Engineering & Physics, 2006, 28(8): 795-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.11.009 |
| [23] | Gao M, Lei W, Wu Z, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength of conventional and expansive pedicle screws with or without calcium based cement augmentation [J]. Clinical Biomechanics, 2011, 26(3): 238-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.10.008 |
| [24] | Tintara H, Aiyarak P, Mitarnun W, et al. Effect of thread pitch on pull-out strength of laparoscopic myoma screws [J]. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2006, 32(4): 428-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00427.x |
| [25] | Sahi A, Gali S. Effect of implant systems in differing bone densities on peri-implant bone stress: a 3 dimensional finite element analysis [J]. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2022, 50: 1300-1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.231 |
| [26] | Wu C, Long H, Fu Y, et al. Finite Element Analysis of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Resistance to Pullout During Exposure to Different Cortical Layers Based on AbaqusCEA Software [J]. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 2023, 57(8): 1329-1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-023-00944-0 |
| [27] | Sakaura H, Miwa T, Yamashita T, et al. Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis [J]. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2017, 28(1): 57-62. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.5.spine161154 |
| [28] | Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation? [J]. Acta neurochirurgica, 2016, 158: 465-471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2705-8 |
| [29] | Viezens L, Sellenschloh K, Püschel K, et al. Impact of screw diameter on pedicle screw fatigue strength—A biomechanical evaluation [J]. World neurosurgery, 2021, 152: e369-e376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.108 |
| [30] | Daud R, Kae W Y, Ayu H M, et al. Effect of thread profile variation on pullout and bending strength of a pedicle screw [C] // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, 2021, 1078(1): 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1078/1/012025 |
