中南林业科技大学, 外国语学院, 湖南长沙 410004
| 摘 要: | 本研究采用基于语料库的多维分析方法,对林学学术英语语域进行系统考察,旨在揭示其语言特征并探讨对EAP教学的启示。基于自建林学SCI论文语料库,运用MAT工具提取语言特征,分析5个主要维度得分,并与通用英语语料进行对比。结果显示:林学学术英语呈现高度信息密集、非叙述性、明晰指称、低劝说意图和抽象化特征,整体接近“学术性阐述”风格。Z-score分析突出过度使用特征(如PHC、SERE、NN)和不足使用特征(如RB、TPP3),强调客观性和信息密度,与通用英语的平衡性形成对比,这些特征反映了林学语域的专业化。教学启示包括调整目标聚焦专业表达、融入语料库驱动内容、采用MAT和AI工具分析学生写作,并量化评估维度得分,以助力学习者转型,提升国际学术交流能力。 |
| 关 键 词: | 多维分析方法; 林学学术英语; 语料库; EAP教学 |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.ssrf.2025.05.001 |
College of Foreign Languages, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
| Abstract: | This study employs a corpus-based multidimensional analysis approach to systematically investigate the register of academic English in forestry, aiming to reveal its linguistic features and explore the implications for EAP teaching. Based on a self-compiled corpus of SCI papers in forestry, linguistic features were extracted using the MAT tool, and the dimension scores of the five primary dimensions were analyzed and compared with those of a General English corpus. The results indicate that forestry academic English exhibits features of high informational density, non-narrativity, explicit reference, low persuasive intent, and abstractness, overall aligning closely with an “Learned Exposition” style. Z-score analysis highlights overused features (e.g., PHC, SERE, NN) and underused features (e.g., RB, TPP3), emphasizing objectivity and informational density, which contrasts with the balanced nature of General English. These features reflect the specialized nature of the forestry register. Pedagogical implications include adjusting learning objectives to focus on professional expression, integrating corpus-driven content, utilizing tools like MAT and AI to analyze student writing, and quantitatively assessing dimension scores to facilitate learners’ transition and enhance their capabilities in international academic communication. |
| Keywords: | Multidimensional Analysis; Forestry Academic English; Corpus; EAP Teaching |
| 1. | 湖南省教育厅优秀青年项目“林学英文学术论文语域的多维研究” (编号: 22B0236) |
| 2. | 湖南省社会科学基金外语科研联合项目“中外作者林学英文学术论文语体对比研究” (编号: 22WLH11) |
| 3. | 校级教改课题“课程思政视角下英语专业读写实践课程教学路径创新研究” |
| [1] | Mu, C. (2021). A multidimensional contrastive analysis of linguistic features between international and local biology journal English research articles. Scientometrics, 126(9), 7901-7916. |
| [2] | 江进林 & 许家金. (2015). 基于语料库的商务英语语域特征多维分析. 外语教学与研究, 47(2), 12. |
| [3] | Asghar S. A., M. A. Mahmood, & Z. M. Asghar. (2018). A multidimensional analysis of Pakistani legal English. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(5), 215-229. |
| [4] | Jin, B. (2018). A multidimensional analysis of research article discussion sections in the field of chemical engineering. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. |
| [5] | 赵朝永. (2019). 基于语料库的《红楼梦》英文全译本语域变异多维分析. 翻译研究与教学 (01), 83-94. |
| [6] | 赵朝永. (2020). 基于语料库的《金瓶梅》英文全译本语域变异多维分析. 外语教学与研究 (02), 283-295+321. |
| [7] | 陈蔚. (2023). 基于国际化视域下林业术语的英语翻译问题——以"2023年八届中国林业学术大会"为例. 林产工业(10). |
| [8] | Luo G, Song J, Wu J (2024). The lexical profile of forestry academic texts: What does it take to understand a specialized discipline? PLoS one 19(12): e0315975. |
| [9] | 宋佳苗, 李广践. 特定主题单词表研究历程、现状与动向. 社会科学研究前沿, 2023, 2(3). |
| [10] | 罗桂花, 李静 & 胡珍珍. (2022). 中外林学SCI刊源论文引言部分的体裁分析与对比. 现代语言学, 10(6), 8. |
| [11] | 胡一茗, & 胡小青. (2024). 学术论文体裁中的语步与元话语关系探究. 现代语言学, 12(3), 293-298. |
| [12] | 吴雪. (2017). 中国学者国际期刊论文句法复杂度与文本可读性研究. 解放军外国语学院学报, 40(5), 9. |
| [13] | Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. London: Routledge. |
| [14] | Biber, D. (2003). Variation among university spoken and written registers: a new multi-dimensional analysis. Language & Computers, 47-70. |
| [15] | Nini, A. (2019). The Multi-Dimensional Analysis Tagger. In Berber Sardinha, T. & Veirano Pinto M. (eds), Multi-Dimensional Analysis: Research Methods and Current Issues, 67-94, London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic. |
| [16] | 潘璠. "多维度研究三十年发展综述和方法详介." 外语教学理论与实践 1(2022): 26-34. |
| [17] | Friginal, E., & Weigle, S. (2014). Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 80-95. |
| [18] | Li, X. (2023). A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of English Writings by Chinese EFL Learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(1), 37-47. |