黄山学院, 教育科学学院, 安徽黄山 245041
| 摘 要: | 社会信任问题古往今来都受到人们关注,较高的社会信任往往会促进国家的发展,社会的和谐。使用文献分析法和问卷法,利用2015中国综合社会调查数据,对7676份来自中国城乡居民的有效问卷进行描述性统计和多元线性回归分析。在前人研究的基础上,把社会信任划分为普遍信任、圈内信任和圈外信任,进而探讨社会信任的现状并实证分析影响因素。研究发现,居民的普遍信任和圈内信任水平处于中等偏上水平,对与自己有血缘、地缘关系的群体倾向于信任;而圈外信任处于较低水平,中国居民的社会信任水平有待提高。从影响因素来看,与他人的交往的频繁程度和熟悉程度与三种信任都存在显著性影响且呈正相关;社会态度中的公平感和幸福感、受教育程度、经济水平对社会信任均有正向促进作用,越认为生活幸福美满的人越容易信任他人;生活在乡镇的居民较城市居民的社会信任水平高。 |
| 关 键 词: | 社会信任; 中国居民; 中国综合社会调查 |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.ssrf.2023.01.005 |
School of Education Science, Huangshan University, Huangshan 245041, China
| Abstract: | The issue of social trust has been concerned by people throughout the ages, a higher social trust will often promote the development of the country, social harmony. By using literature analysis and questionnaire method and using the data of 2015 China comprehensive Social survey, Descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis were conducted on 7676 valid questionnaires from urban and rural residents in China.on the basis of previous studies, social trust is divided into universal trust, in-circle trust and out-circle trust, to discuss the current situation of social trust and empirically analyze the influencing factors. The results show that the general trust level of the residents and the trust level in the circle is above the medium level, They tend to trust groups with blood and geographical relationship with themselves;while the trust level outside the circle is low, and the social trust level of Chinese residents needs to be improved. From the perspective of influencing factors, The frequency and familiarity of communication with others have a significant impact on and a positive correlation with the three types of trust;frequent and familiar social contacts, sense of justice and happiness in social attitudes, education level and economic level all have a positive effect on social trust. The more people think that life is happy and happy, the easier it is to trust others.Residents living in towns and townships have a higher level of social trust than those living in cities. |
| Keywords: | Social Trust; Chinese Residents; China General Social Survey |
| 1. | 黄山学院校级结转项目 (2022JZSK52) |
| [1] | 郑也夫. 信任论 [M]. 北京: 中国广播电视出版社, 2001. |
| [2] | 谢绚丽.论社会信任结构与社会整合 [D]. 浙江师范大学, 2006. |
| [3] | 马克斯▪韦伯,经济与社会 [M]. 林荣远译.北京:商务印书馆, 2004. |
| [4] | 费孝通. 乡土中国 生育制度 [M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1998. |
| [5] | 吴江龙, 刘伶俐. 关于当下中国社会信任状况的实证分析——基于八个省市的数据 [J]. 中共福建省委党校学报, 2015 (06): 75-83. |
| [6] | 李志, 邱萍, 张皓. 城市居民社会信任现状及提升途径——以重庆市为例 [J]. 城市问题, 2014 (01): 2-8. |
| [7] | 吴进进. 理性化: 教育水平对社会信任的发展与调节效应[J]. 社会发展研究, 2019, 6 (02): 115-134+244. |
| [8] | 龚娇, 李伟强, 陈铭, 汤明, 袁博. 社会阶层与信任之间的关系: 来自元分析的证据 [J]. 心理技术与应用, 2019, 7 (06): 346-357. |
| [9] | 奚春华. 中国城市居民信任的特征与影响因素 [D]. 华中科技大学, 2005. |
| [10] | Luca Zanin. Education and Life Satisfaction in Relation to the Probability of Social Trust: a Conceptual Framework and Empirical Analysis [J]. Social Indicators Research, 2017, 132 (2): 925-947. |
| [11] | Patricea Elena Bertea, Ana Mihei. Social Trust – Differences and Similarties between Eastern European Countries [J]. Eurint, 2014. 1: 29-37. |
| [12] | Richard Asante. Dynamics and Trends in Social Trust in Ghana [J]. International Area Studies Review, 2014, 17 (1). |
| [13] | Ali Abdelzadeh, Erik Lundberg. Solid or Flexible? Social Trust from Early Adolescence to Young Adulthood [J]. Scandinavian Political Studies, 2017, 40 (2): 207-227. |
| [14] | 曾润喜, 斗维红. 媒体信任与人际信任的关系及社会交往的调节作用——基于中国综合社会调查(CGSS 2010)数据的实证研究 [J]. 新闻与传播评论, 2019, 72 (05): 46-57. |
| [15] | 丁从明, 张亮, 王聪. 转型背景下的收入差距与社会信任[J]. 经济与管理论, 2020, 36 (02): 15-25. |