开放取用之研究发展和趋势
国立政治大学, 图书资讯与档案学研究所, 台湾 116011
| 摘 要： | 自21世纪初学术界提出开放取用（Open Access, OA）后，它一直是学术界备受争议的议题。在图书馆学与信息科学领域，开放取用更是一个讨论的热点。然而，由于开放取用涉及众多复杂的议题，以致部分学者对它仍然相当陌生。有鉴于此，本研究检视从Scopus系统收录的近20年（2002-2022年）共1,181篇关于开放取用的学术论文；运用文献计量分析方法，总结了开放取用研究的特点，包括论文数量、发表时间、发表国家、研究机构、资助机构、主题领域等。研究结果显示，开放取用是一个相对比较新的研究领域，发展迅速。在开放取用之研究中，无论由论文数量、研究机构、资助机构等角度检视，美国都是霸主，其他较有影响力的地区或国家有欧洲联盟、英国和印度。此外，本研究运用VOSviewer制作网络图谱将分析结果可视化，找出开放取用6个主要研究范畴，分别是“开放取用与各类出版”、“科学文献数据库”、“印度电子期刊”、“疫症”、“学者活动”、和“开放取用出版”。早期的研究比较集中于研究开放取用的出版，影响系数和机构资料库，最近的热门研究课题是冠状病毒疾病、公共卫生、文献计量学和掠夺性出版。通过文献计量分析，本研究找出开放取用研究的内容、定位、特征和发展。 |
| 关 键 词： | 开放取用; 学术文献; 文献计量分析; 研究范畴; Scopus |
| DOI： | 10.57237/j.jeit.2023.04.001 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2023-11-17
接受日期: 2024-01-03
在线出版日期: 2024-01-20
The Development and Trends of Research on Open Access
Graduate Institute of Library, Information and Archival Studies, National Chengchi University, Taiwan 116011,
| Abstract: | The idea of Open Access (OA) was introduced in the early 2000s. Since then, OA has been a controversial topic in academia, especially in the fields of librarianship and information science. However, many people and even some scholars are still quite unfamiliar with OA because of many complicated issues. Therefore, this study examines 1,181 academic documents on open access published in 2002-2022 from Scopus. Bibliometric analysis is performed to determine some key characteristics of open access research, including the number of documents, time of publication, country of publication, research institution, funding agency, subject area, etc. The results show that open access is a relatively new research field with rapid development. In the research field of open access, the United States is the dominant player in terms of the number of papers, research institutions, funding agencies, etc., while other influential regions or countries include the European Union, the United Kingdom, and India. In addition, this study utilizes VOSviewer to create a network map, visualizing the results and identifying six main research categories in the field of OA." These categories are "Open Access and Various Types of Publishing," "Scientific Literature Databases," "Indian Electronic Journals," "Epidemics," "Scholarly Activities," and "Open Access Publishing." Early research focused on studying open access publishing, impact factors, and institutional repositories, and more recently popular research topics are coronavirus disease, public health, bibliometrics, and predatory publishing. These findings contribute valuable insights into the development and trends of research on OA. |
| Keywords: | Open-Access; Academic Literature; Bibliometric Analysis; Research Area; Scopus |
参考文献
| [1] | Hagve, M. The money behind academic publishing. Tidsskrift Den norske legeforening [Z], 2023. https://tidsskriftet.no/en/2020/08/kronikk/money-behind-academic-publishing. |
| [2] | Harvard Blogs (n.d.) Open Access 101: Unlocking Knowledge. Harvard Blogs [Z]. https://blogs.harvard.edu/openaccess101/what-is-open-access/what-is-open-access/ |
| [3] | Chan, L., Cuplinskas, D., Eisen, M., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J-C., Hagemann, M., Harnad, S., Johnson, R., Kupryte, R., La Manna, M., Rév, I., Segbert, M., de Souza, S. Suber, P., & Velterop, J.. Budapest open access initiative [Z]. 2002 https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read |
| [4] | Lewis, D. W. The inevitability of open access [J]. College & Research Libraries, 2012, 75(5): 493-506. |
| [5] | Ghent University. Open Access colours: green, gold, diamond, hybrid and more [Z]. Ghent University, 2022. |
| [6] | Beall, J. Predatory publishers are corrupting open access [J]. Nature, 2012, 489(7415): 179–179. |
| [7] | Kirtania, D. K. Growth and Development of Indian Open Access Scholarly Publications: A Bibliometric Assessment [J]. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2021, 6034. |
| [8] | Dias, P. M., Dias, T. M. R., Moita, G. F. Publications in open access journals: a bibliometric analysis. In: Pinto, A. L., Arencibia-Jorge, R. (eds) Data and Information in Online Environments. DIONE 2022. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering [M], Springer, 2022, 452. |
| [9] | Hubbard, D. E. Open access citation advantage? A local study at a large research university [J]. The Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2017, 54(1): 712-713. |
| [10] | Patel, RB, Vaduganathan, M., Mosarla, R. C., Venkateswaran, R. V., Bhatt, D. L., & Bonow, R. O. Open access publishing and subsequent citations among articles in major cardiovascular journals [J]. American Journal of Medicine, 2019, 132(9): 1103-1105. |
| [11] | Yuen, J., Muquit, S., Whitfield, P. C. Correlation between cost of publication and journal impact. comprehensive cross-sectional study of exclusively open-access surgical journals [J]. Journal of Surgical Education, 2019, 76(1): 107-119. |
| [12] | Narayan, A., Lobner, K., Fritz, J. Open access journal policies: a systematic analysis of radiology journals [J]. Journal of American College Radiology, 2018, 15(2), 237-242. |
| [13] | Abdullah, S. & Timan, H. Knowledge management: A bibliometric analysis of open access journals [C], 2010 International Conference on Information Retrieval & Knowledge Management (CAMP), Shah Alam, Malaysia. |
| [14] | Sánchez, A. D., del Río-Rama, M. C., Cruz, M., & García, J.Á. Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 2017, 23(1): 8–15. |
| [15] | Scopus. Scopus Content Coverage Guide [Z], 2023. https://www.elsevier.com/?a=69451 |
| [16] | Cobo, M. J., A. G. López-Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, & F. Herrera. Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools [J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62(7): 1382–1402. |
