On the Protection via Neighboring Right of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC)
School of Political Science and Law, Zhaoqing University, Zhaoqing 526061, China
| Abstract: | The understanding and application of copyright law with regards to AI generated images has created significant challenges. China and the United States demonstrate that the judicial bodies of the two countries have distinct differences in their attitude towards copyright protection of AI generated material. The reason is that the generation process of artificial intelligence generator includes two stages of user input instruction and automatic generation of artificial intelligence program. The discussion focuses on the personalized characteristics of the instructions in the user input stage and the automatic characteristics stage, which will determine whether the artificial intelligence generated material can be protected by copyright. This paper argues that the neighboring rights approach can better integrate these two stages. By comparing the object of rights, the subject of rights, and the content of rights between AI generated works and existing neighboring rights, it can be found that AI generated works are in conformity with neighboring rights, which can resolve the dilemma of "either this or that" choice faced by the copyright approach. However, neighboring rights are typical statutory rights and need to be coordinated with the copyright protection of the existing works used by artificial intelligence. Whether it is necessary to legislate on neighboring rights for artificial intelligence generated works still awaits further observation over time. |
| Keywords: | Artificial Intelligence Product; Neighboring Right; Copyright; Legality |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.ha.2026.01.001 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2026-01-16
接受日期: 2026-02-04
在线出版日期: 2026-02-26
基金
| 1. | This research was funded by Guangdong Provincial Edu-cational Science Planning Project (2025GXJK0578) |
参考文献
| [1] | Ethem Alpaydin. Machine Learning. Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 2021: 167. |
| [2] | Dang, Allison. (2024). How international precedence can inform future u.s. copyright law applications to generative ai. Notre Dame Journal on Emerging Technologies (JET), 5(2), 213. |
| [3] | Wang, Runhua. (2024). The copyright requirement of human authorship for works containing artificial intelligence-generated content. IP Theory, 13(2), 32. |
| [4] | Wu Handong. Research on Basic Issues of Intangible Property Rights (Fourth Edition). Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2020: 254. |
| [5] | Bodenhausen, George H. C. (1954). Protection of neighboring rights. Law and Contemporary Problems, 19(2), 156-171. |
| [6] | Massadeh, F., Alnusair, F., Massadeh, A. A. M., & Ismail, M.(2024). The legal protection of artificial intelligence-generated work: The argument for sui generis over copyright. Corporate Law & Governance Review, 6(1), 49. |
| [7] | Kariyawasam, Kanchana. (2020). Artificial intelligence and challenges for copyright law. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 28(4), 291-292. |
| [8] | Oda, Barron. (2023). No ghost in the machine: on human creativity and why ai-generated images from text prompts are not protected by copyright. SciTech Lawyer, 20(1), 25. |
| [9] | Shtefan, Anna. (2023). Creations of artificial intelligence: in search of the legal protection regime. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 14(1), 104. |
| [10] | Qin Tao, Zhang Xudong. (2018). On the Logic and Path of Copyright Law Protection for Artificial Intelligence Creations. Journal of East China University of Science and Technology, 6, 77 - 86. |
| [11] | Feliu, Vicenc. (2021). Our brains beguil'd: copyright protection for ai created works. Intellectual Property and Technology Law Journal, 25(2), 126. |
| [12] | Caldwell, Mackenzie. (2023). What is an "author"? copyright authorship of ai art through philosophical lens. Houston Law Review, 61(2), 441. |
| [13] | Tao Qian. (2018). On the Protection of the Results Generated by Artificial Intelligence by Copyright Law: The Establishment of the Right of Data Processors as a Neighboring Right. Law Science, 4, 3 - 15. |
| [14] | Matulionyte, Rita, & Lee, Jyh-An. (2022). Copyright in ai-generated works: lessons from recent developments in patent law. SCRIPTed: Journal of Law, Technology and Society, 19(1), 7-12. |
| [15] | Ahrenstein, Andrew. (2024). Ai generated art and the gap in copyright law. American University Intellectual Property Brief, 15(2), 36. |
| [16] | Li Weimin. (2020). Reconstruction of the System of Works Created in the Course of Employment and the Choice of the Path for Determining the Copyright Ownership of Works Generated by Artificial Intelligence". Law Review, 3, 108-124. |
| [17] | Wang, F. F. (2023). Copyright protection for ai-generated works: solutions to further challenges from generative ai. Amicus Curiae, 5(1), 100. |
| [18] | Herms, Jules. (2024). You Can't Mimic Progress: Why AI-Generated Works Should Not Be Granted Copyright Protection. Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 26, 176. |
| [19] | Abbott, Ryan, & Rothman, Elizabeth. (2023). Disrupting creativity: copyright law in the age of generative artificial intelligence. Florida Law Review, 75(6), 1200. |
| [20] | Naqvi, Zack. (2020). Artificial intelligence, copyright, and copyright infringement. Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review, 24(1), 34-35. |
| [21] | Senftleben, M., & Buijtelaar, L. (2020). Robot Creativity: An Incentive-Based Neighbouring Rights Approach. European Intellectual Property Review, 42(12), 808. |
| [22] | Sun, Haochen. (2022). Redesigning copyright protection in the era of artificial intelligence. Iowa Law Review, 107(3), 1238-1242. |
| [23] | Militsyna, Kateryna. (2020). Ai caravan moves on. does it need copyright incentives?. Law Review of Kyiv University of Law, 2020(4), 321. |
| [24] | Meng, Chu. (2023). Copyright protection of artificial intelligence generated works from an industrial perspective. China Legal Science, 11(6), 111. |
| [25] | Mort, S. A. (1997). The wto, wipo & the internet: confounding the borders of copyright and neighboring rights. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, 8(1), 175. |
| [26] | Kinsara, O. A. (2021). Clash of dilemmas: how should uk copyright law approach the advent of autonomous ai creations?. Cambridge Law Review, 6(2), 62-63. |
| [27] | Greene, Thomas F. IV. (2024). Artificial intelligence and copyright: why the united states should grant full copyright protection to works produced using artificial intelligence. IDEA: The Law Review of the Franklin Pierce Center for Intellectual Property, 64(3), 826. |
| [28] | Papadopoulou, Anthoula. (2021). Creativity in crisis: are the creations of artificial intelligence worth protecting?. Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 12(3), 417-418. |
| [29] | Dadia, Tal, Lee, Chuan, Xin, Tan Hui, Kaur, Harseerat, & Greenbaum, Dov. (2021). Can AI Find Its Place within the Broad Ambit of Copyright Law?. Berkeley Journal of Entertainment and Sports Law, 10, 78. |
| [30] | Murray, M. D. (2023). Generative ai art: copyright infringement and fair use. SMU Science and Technology Law Review, 26(2), 314-315. |
| [31] | Zurth, Patrick. (2021). Artificial creativity? case against copyright protection for ai-generated works. UCLA Journal of Law and Technology, 25(2), 18. |
