基础学科“三层次-四维度”竞赛体系的构建与实践
北京建筑大学, 理学院, 北京 102627
| 摘 要： | 在众多学科竞赛之中，数学建模竞赛、数学竞赛、物理竞赛、物理实验竞赛、力学竞赛、图学竞赛等“数理力图”基础学科竞赛是培养学生实践和创新创业能力的有效载体，是激发学生潜能和创造力的有效手段。随着学校近年来参赛人数、获奖数量和级别的提升，从“校-市-国家”三个层次、“基础-培训-竞赛-跟踪”四个维度着手，对构建“数理力图”基础学科竞赛体系进行了研究与实践，取得了一定的成效。“三层次”使更多的学生可以参与基础学科竞赛，有助于提升获奖数量和获奖级别。“四维度”涵盖了赛前、赛中和赛后，不仅能促进公共基础课程的教学改革，而且让基础学科竞赛贯穿于学生的四年大学学习，更加有效地服务于专业培养目标，为当前新工科背景下应用型、复合型、创新型人才的培养提供有效途径。 |
| 关 键 词： | 数理力图; 基础学科; 三层次; 四维度; 竞赛体系 |
| DOI： | 10.57237/j.edu.2022.02.004 |
View:
Downloads:
收稿日期: 2022-11-03
接受日期: 2022-12-26
在线出版日期: 2023-01-05
Construction and Practice of the "Three Levels - Four Dimensions" System for Basic Disciplines Competitions
School of Science, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102627, China
| Abstract: | Mathematical modeling competition, mathematical competition, physical competition, physical experiment competition, mechanics competition and graphics competition are basic discipline competitions in university. These basic discipline competitions of “Mathematics-Physics-Mechanics-Graphics” are an effective carrier to cultivate students' ability of practice, innovation and entrepreneurship, which are also an effective means to stimulate students' potential and creativity. With the increase of the number of participants, the number of awards and the level in recent years, the basic discipline competitions system of “Mathematics-Physics-Mechanics-Graphics” is studied and practiced from the three levels of "School-City-Country" and the four dimensions of "Foundation-Training-Competition-Tracking", which has achieved certain results. The "three levels" enables more students to participate in basic discipline competitions, which is helpful to improve the number and level of awards. The "Four Dimensions" covers the pre competition, competition and post competition. It can not only promote the teaching reform of public basic courses, but also let the basic discipline competition run through the students' four-year college study, which makes the basic discipline competitions more effective in serving the professional training objectives and provides an effective way to cultivate the talents of applied, complex and innovative. |
| Keywords: | Mathematics-Physics-Mechanics-Graphics; Basic Discipline; Three Levels; Four Dimensions; Competition System |
基金
| 1. | 中国建设教育协会教育教学科研项目 (2021058, 2019010) |
| 2. | 北京建筑大学研究生教育教学质量提升项目 (J2022021). |
参考文献
| [1] | 郑庆华. 以创新创业教育为引领创建“新工科”教育模式 [J]. 中国大学教学, 2017, 12: 8-12. |
| [2] | 李丽娟, 杨文斌, 肖明等. 跨学科多专业融合的“新工科”人才培养模式探索与实践 [J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2020, 1: 25-30. |
| [3] | 林健. 面向未来的中国新工科建设 [J]. 清华大学教育研究, 2017, 2: 26-35. |
| [4] | 袁磊. “新工科”建设背景下校企协同育人模式的研究与实践 [J]. 工业和信息化教育, 2021, 7: 29-33. |
| [5] | 钟登华. 新工科建设的内涵与行动 [J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2017, 3: 1-6. |
| [6] | 陆国栋, 陈临强. 高校学科竞赛评估: 思路、方法和探索 [J]. 中国高教研究, 2018, 2: 63-74. |
| [7] | 丁广龙, 夏镇波, 辛志宏等. 创新创业教育: 新工科类大学生学科竞赛体系构建 [J]. 创新创业教育, 2019, 10 (2): 121-125. |
| [8] | 孙远韬, 张氢, 朱玉田等. 面向工程教育认证的以学科竞赛为载体的高校创新型人才培养研究 [J]. 高教学刊, 2020, 21: 29-32. |
| [9] | 王毅, 张沪寅, 黄建忠. 新工科人才培养导向的竞赛类实践课程设计 [J]. 实验技术与管理, 2020, 37 (8): 167-171. |
| [10] | 高迪, 印桂生, 孙建国. 新工科视域下的高等教育课程教学质量提升研究 [J]. 黑龙江高教研究, 2018, 12: 144-147. |
| [11] | 林健, 彭林, Brent jesiek. 普渡大学本科工程教育改革实践及对新工科建设的启示 [J]. 高等工程教育研究, 2019, 1: 15-26. |
| [12] | 鞠炼,王怡人,徐金妹．产教融合背景下应用型本科院校建筑类人才培养路径研究——以常州大学怀德学院为例 [J]. 科技经济导刊, 2020, 15: 28-29. |
| [13] | 白羽, 徐志洁, 何强, 王恒友. 数学建模竞赛驱动下大学生创新能力培养模式的探索 [J]. 教育进展, 2021, 11 (5): 1490-1495. |
| [14] | 姚利花, 郭刚, 张占东, 等. 学科竞赛和实践教学相融合培养“新工科”人才的研究 [J]. 大学教育, 2020, 6: 38-40. |
| [15] | 程谊. 学科竞赛背景下的创新创业人才培养模式探讨 [J]. 创新创业理论研究与实践, 2019, 2 (18): 107-108. |
| [16] | 耿敬, 欧阳卫平. 高校人才培养实验班培养实践与探索 [J]. 教育现代化, 2019, 7: 1-3. |
