南华大学, 语言文学学院, 湖南衡阳 421200
| 摘 要: | 古诗是中华古典文化特有的表达方式,其丰富的内涵往往在目标语文化体系中缺乏对应的表达形式。意境是古诗的灵魂,许多意境都是通过具体的图形和背景关系呈现的。本文基于图形—背景理论,选取唐诗及许渊冲的英译本为研究对象,运用Aixelá提出的十一种翻译方法,从图形—背景的定义特征、动态性和突显性三个方面对原诗中的图形和背景进行深入分析。本研究旨在探讨译者在翻译中如何处理原诗中的图形和背景,以及所采用的翻译方法,以有效传达原诗的内涵与意境。许渊冲在翻译中充分发挥了译者的能动性,尽可能遵循原诗的图形与背景,力求最大限度地保留和再现古诗的精华与意境。然而,为了增强译文的连贯性、流畅性和表现力,或在目标语境中营造相应的意境氛围,许渊冲在某些情况下选择了创译原诗的图形与背景,以提高译文的可读性。在采用的翻译方法方面,许渊冲将古诗的文化内涵和表层形式有机结合,对古诗中的地名主要采用语言翻译和删除的方法,而对蕴含典故的词语则主要利用语言翻译和绝对泛化的方法,总体而言,他致力于使译诗简洁明了,以便于目标语读者的理解。译者应适当运用多种翻译策略,以传达原文中图形—背景图式的核心意涵,实现更为全面和准确的文化传播。图形—背景理论能够探析古诗意境形成的方式,从理性的视角解读诗人表达情感的方法,为古诗的翻译和译文的分析提供了可靠的视角。 |
| 关 键 词: | 图形—背景; 翻译方法; 唐诗; 许渊冲 |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.cll.2024.04.001 |
School of Languages and Literature, University of South China, Hengyang 421200, China
| Abstract: | Classical Chinese poetry is a unique form of expression within Chinese classical culture, and its rich connotations often lack corresponding expressions in target language cultural systems. The artistic conception is regarded as the soul of poetry, and many of the artistic conceptions are presented through specific relationships between figures and backgrounds. This paper is based on the Figure-Background Theory, selecting Tang poetry and Xu Yuanchong’s English translations as research subjects. It employs Aixelá’s eleven translation methods to analyze the figures and backgrounds in the original poems from three aspects: the defining characteristics, motion and salience. This research aims to explore how the translator handles the figures and backgrounds in the original poems during the translation process and the translation methods he employs to effectively convey the connotations and artistic conception of the original poetry. Xu Yuanchong actively exercised his agency as a translator, striving to adhere as closely as possible to the figures and backgrounds of the original poems, with the goal of preserving and reproducing the essence and artistic conception of classical poetry. However, in order to enhance the coherence, fluency, and expressiveness of the translations or to create an appropriate artistic conception within the target context, Xu Yuanchong occasionally opted for creative translations of the original figures and backgrounds to improve the readability of the translations Regarding the translation methods employed, Xu organically combined the cultural connotations and surface forms of classical poetry, using linguistic translation and deletion methods primarily for geographical names, while employing linguistic translation and absolute universalization methods for terms that contain allusions. Overall, he aimed to make the translated poetry clear and direct to the understanding of target language readers. Translators should utilize a variety of translation strategies appropriately to convey the core meanings of the figure-background schema in the original text, achieving a more comprehensive and accurate cultural dissemination. Figure-Background Theory enables an exploration of how the artistic conception of classical poetry is formed, and it provides a rational perspective for interpreting the poet’s methods of expressing emotions, thus offering a reliable framework for the translation and analysis of classical poetry. |
| Keywords: | Figure-Ground Theory; Translation Methods; Tang Poetry; Xu Yuanchong |
| [1] | 刘宇红. 认知语言学: 理论与应用 [M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2006: 12. |
| [2] | 高娟, 李安华. Talmy图形背景理论概述 [J]. 文学语言学研究, 2008(6): 48-50. |
| [3] | 匡芳涛, 文旭. 图形—背景的现实化 [J]. 外国语 (上海外国语大学学报), 2003, (04): 24-31. |
| [4] | 李良彦. 认知诗学视域下的文学阅读 [J]. 东北农业大学学报 (社会科学版), 2012, (10): 72-74. |
| [5] | Peter Stockwel. Cognitive Poetics and Literary Theory [J]. Journal of Literary theory, 2007(1): 135-152. |
| [6] | 黄国文. 对唐诗《寻隐者不遇》英译文的功能语篇分析 [J].解放军外国语学报, 2002, (05): 67-70+115. |
| [7] | 汪珍, 胡东平. 图形—背景理论下颜色隐喻的英译研究——以《鲁迅小说选》两个英译本为例 [J]. 西南交通大学学报 (社会科学版), 2011, 12(03): 30-36. |
| [8] | 侯敏. 基于图形—背景理论的汉英翻译教学研究 [J]. 教育理论与实践, 2015, 35(09): 59-60. |
| [9] | 李鹏娟, 张红. 图形背景理论下《静夜思》英译文认知解读[J]. 中国教育学刊, 2016, (S1): 35-36+39. |
| [10] | Aixelá, J. F. 1996. Culture-Specific Items in Translation. In: Ávarez, R. and Vidal, M. C.-Á., Eds., Translation, Power, Subversion, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, 52-78. |
| [11] | Venuti, Lawrence. The Translator's Invisibility [M]. London & New York: Routledge, 1995: 20. |
| [12] | 田薇. 认知视角下中国古典诗词的语篇连贯研究——以《天净沙•秋思》为例[J]. 江苏科技大学学报 (社会科学版), 2016, 16(04): 62-66. |
| [13] | 王明树,文旭. 主观化对等”在翻译中的应用——以李白诗歌《送友人》英译为例[J]. 外语与外语教学, 2009, (08): 62-65. |
| [14] | Talmy, L. Towards a Cognitive Semantics Vol. 1. [M]. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2012.311-344. |
| [15] | 许渊冲. 新编千家诗 [M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2006: 19, 21, 23, 27, 83, 101. |
| [16] | 陈晖. 基于图形—背景理论的“送别诗”认知诗学分析——以《送元二使安西》《别董大》为例 [J]. 山西高等学校社会科学学报, 2015, 27(12): 93-95. |
| [17] | 谭梦. 图形-背景理论视角下汉语古诗英译的句法结构探讨 [J]. 北京化工大学学报 (社会科学版), 2017,(01): 72-78. |
| [18] | 董如成. 转喻的认知解释 [J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2004(2): 6-9. |