Urban Governance Research Based on Conjugate Contradiction Analysis: Taking Zibo as an Example
1. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2. School of Statistics and Information, Shanghai University of International Business and Economics, Shanghai 201620, China
3. School of Marxism, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
| Abstract: | From the perspectives of conjugate resources and their transformations, this paper proposes conjugate contradiction analysis method, and discusses the urban governance model and governance pathway of the popularity of "Zibo barbecue". The research suggests that there are two main contradictions in Zibo's urban governance. One is the contradiction between emotional governance and rigid governance, among which emotional governance involves mainly the allocation, optimization, and utilization of soft resources and non-material resources in the city. And the other is the contradiction between a proactive government and an effective market, involving mainly the allocation, optimization, and utilization of material and hard resources in the city. The study reveals that the "synergistic governance between an effective market and a proactive government with emotional governance as a core feature" is the main approach for Zibo to solve the above contradictions. Four governance pathways including "tempering hardness with emotion and coupling hardness with softness", "promising government and effective market", "online marketing, offline realization" and "endogenous drive, exogenous promotion" are refined. The research shows that the allocation, optimization, and utilization of governance resources in the urban governance process can be understood more comprehensively, and the essence and laws of urban governance can be revealed more profoundly with conjugate contradiction analysis method, which includes structure in terms of (soft part and hard part) systematicity, composition in terms of (real part and virtual part) solidity and function, value in terms of (negative part and positive part) oppositeness, and dynamics in terms of (latent part and apparent part) changeability. The research results provide useful references and insights for urban governance and high-quality development practices. |
| Keywords: | Urban Governance; Conjugate Contradiction Analysis; Conjugate Resources; Conjugate Transformation; Governance Pathway |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.wjmst.2024.02.002 |
View:
Downloads:
Received: 5 July 2024
Accepted: 19 August 2024
Published Online: 29 August 2024
Funding
| 1. | 国家自然科学基金项目 (72071049) |
| 2. | 广东省哲学社会科学规划基金项目 (GD23XGL021, GD23XGL024) |
| 3. | 广东工业大学科学研究项目 (GXLX20210207) |
References
| [1] | 陈伟. 地方政府推进中国式现代化建设的实践创新: 基于“淄博烧烤”的分析 [J]. 中国软科学, 2023(10): 53-63. |
| [2] | Chaoyu Y. Opportunities and Strategies for Promoting Cultural Tourism Industry on Small Screens in the New Media Perspective—Take Zibo Barbecue out Circle as an Example [J]. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 2023, 6(18): 72-76. |
| [3] | 何斌, 简浩, 胡卫敏等. 城市情感治理的内在逻辑及其过程机制——以“淄博烧烤”为例 [J]. 北京交通大学学报 (社会科学版), 2023, 22(3): 74-83. |
| [4] | 李占祥. 李占祥自选集 [M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2007. |
| [5] | 杨春燕, 李兴森. 可拓学40年发展历程及研究进展 [J]. 广东工业大学学报, 2023, 40(6): 1-11. |
| [6] | 杨春燕, 蔡文, 汤龙.可拓学第2版 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2024. |
| [7] | 蔡文, 杨春燕, 何斌.可拓逻辑初步 [M]. 科学出版社, 2003. |
| [8] | Li Li, Bin He, Weiguo Tang, Xiaoxiao He and Guopei Lin. Extension conjugate contradiction analysis: a framework for enterprise management [C]. Proceedings of ITQM 2024 (Bucharest, Romania), August, 2024. |
| [9] | 李占祥. 矛盾管理学: 企业可持续成长之路 [M]. 经济管理出版社, 2000: 50-56. |
| [10] | 王凤彬, 安百宇, 张雪. 系统思维下复工与防疫悖论解决的过程分析框架 [J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(08): 1147-1157. |
| [11] | Lewis M W. Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2000, 25(4): 760-776. |
| [12] | Li P P. The unique value of yin-yang balancing: a critical response [J]. Management and Organization Review, 2014, 10 (2): 321-332. |
| [13] | Schad J, Lewis M W, Raisch S, et al. Paradox research in management science: looking back to move forward [J]. The Academy of Management Annals, 2016, 10(1): 5-64. |
| [14] | 蔡文. 创意的革命今天你“可拓”了吗 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010. |
| [15] | 何雪松. 情感治理: 新媒体时代的重要治理维度 [J]. 探索与争鸣, 2016(11): 40-42. |
| [16] | 何雪松. 城市文脉、市场化遭遇与情感治理 [J]. 探索与争鸣, 2017(9): 36-38. |
| [17] | 刘太刚, 向昉. “以规治情”与“以情治情”: 社区情感治理的再认识 [J]. 中国行政管理, 2021(6): 11-18. |
| [18] | 吕小康. 怨气: 情感社会学的阐释 [J]. 社会科学, 2017, (8): 79-84. |
| [19] | 王鹏. 基于情感社会学视角的社会秩序与社会控制 [J]. 天津社会科学, 2014(2): 75-79. |
| [20] | 朱志伟, 孙菲. 空间、结构与网络: 社区情感治理的三重论域与实践路径 [J]. 贵州社会科学, 2020(5): 36-41. |
| [21] | 何斌, 简浩, 王若恩等. 情感治理赋能旅游城市高质量发展: 以淄博为例 [J]. 西部旅游, 2024. |
| [22] | 孙平, 王德刚. 从“媒体出圈”到“价值共创”: 非传统旅游城市目的地品牌生态圈塑造研究 [J]. 山东大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2024(1): 30-41. |
| [23] | 张耀军, 毛开元. 城市网红经济的形成与传导机制——兼论淄博烧烤走红的区域经济学意义 [J]. 开发研究, 2024(1): 1-15. |
| [24] | 张培. 地方政府应急管理能力与城市形象提升——基于“淄博烧烤”的案例研究 [J]. 四川行政学院学报, 2023(4): 82-89. |
| [25] | 刘智勇. 柔性组织网络建构: 基于政府、企业、NPO、市民之间参与与合作的公共服务供给机制创新研究 [J]. 公共管理研究, 2008, (2): 170-187. |
| [26] | 谭英俊. 柔性治理: 21世纪政府治道变革的逻辑选择与发展趋向 [J]. 理论探讨, 2014, (3): 150-153. |
| [27] | Oliveira E. Editorial for virtual special issue: The emergence of new forms of flexible governance arrangements in and for urban regions: an European perspective [J]. Regional Studies, 2017, 4(1): 1-6. |
| [28] | 王加利. 城市柔性治理的内涵、价值及其实现路径 [J]. 中共郑州市委党校学报, 2022, (1): 63-67. |
| [29] | 何斌, 王若恩, 简浩等. 城市柔性治理的底层逻辑及其结构面向——基于“淄博烧烤”的分析 [J]. 管理科学与技术, 2024, 3(1): 1-9. |
Join the Editorial Board
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsBecome a Reviewer
Scholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us