Comparative Study on the Clinical Efficacy of Gallstone Preservation and Cholecystectomy
Emergency Department, Xingyang People's Hospital, Zhengzhou 450100, China
| Abstract: | In recent years, with the change of people's diet structure, the incidence of gallbladder stones has increased gradually. Gallbladder stones is a common clinical disease, the common clinical treatment methods are gallstone preservation and cholecystectomy. Objective: To compare the clinical effects of gallbladder stone removal and cholecystectomy in the treatment of gallbladder stones. Methods: The 72 patients with gallbladder stones in our hospital were divided into the gallstone preservation group and the cholecystectomy group, 36 cases in each group. The surgical conditions and treatment effects of the two groups were statistically analyzed, and the two groups of patients were followed up for 6 months. Results: The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative bowel movement recovery time, and diet recovery time in the gallstone preservation group were shorter than those in the cholecystectomy group. Compared with the cholecystectomy group, the gallstone preservation group had lower complication rate and higher hospitalization costs, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). During the follow-up period of the two groups, the B-ultrasound in the cholecystectomy group was normal, and 4 cases (11.1%) in the gallstone preservation group had recurrence of stones. Conclusion: Gallstone preservation and cholecystectomy have their own characteristics in the treatment of gallbladder stones and have good clinical effects. They need to be appropriately selected according to their own conditions and personal wishes in patients with gallbladder stones. |
| Keywords: | Gallbladder Stones; Gallstone Preservation; Cholecystectomy; Treatment; Clinical Efficacy |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.wjcm.2022.01.002 |
View:
Downloads:
Received: 22 September 2022
Accepted: 28 October 2022
Published Online: 1 November 2022
References
| [1] | 马荣强, 于海鹏, 史永腾, 杨扬, 杨卫军, 孟春英, 闫成涛, 马超群, 孙传东. 腹腔镜联合胆道镜治疗胆囊结石伴胆囊管结石 [J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2022, 27 (08): 598-601. |
| [2] | 谢育锋, 张杰, 尹从. 腹腔镜下手术治疗胆囊结石的效果观察 [J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2021, 23 (06): 62-64. |
| [3] | 李健. 三种不同手术方式治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石疗效分析 [D]. 山西医科大学, 2021. |
| [4] | 许臣, 顾利国, 郑亚民. 老年人胆囊结石与急性结石性胆囊炎临床诊疗研究进展 [J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2022, 49 (08): 572-576. |
| [5] | 陈世勇. 胆囊结石合并胆囊癌危险因素及高危人群评分筛选模型的初步研究 [D]. 宁夏医科大学, 2021. |
| [6] | 付前广, 李倩, 冯小雪, 王勇, 邓如兵, 崔畅. 腹腔镜胆总管探查术联合腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者临床疗效研究 [J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2021, 24 (04): 589-592. |
| [7] | 张林丰, 张玉沛. 内镜微创保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果 [J]. 中外医学研究, 2021, 19 (14): 21-23. |
| [8] | 沈晔, 胡瑾瑾, 朱洁琳. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术对患者肝功能、免疫应激水平的影响 [J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2022, 27 (04): 678-679. |
| [9] | 张加鹏, 周少波, 褚亮, 蒋磊, 崔培元. 腹腔镜胆囊切除联合腹腔镜胆总管探查术对胆囊结石并胆总管结石患者预后及围手术期应激情况的影响观察 [J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2022, 50 (08): 952-955. |
| [10] | 陈雨强主编. 胆囊炎与胆石症 第3版 [M]. 北京：中国医药科技出版社, 2021. 3-4. |
| [11] | 李玉亮作. 胆石症介入治疗学 [M]. 北京：人民卫生出版社, 2021. 2-16. |
| [12] | 顾勇劲. 腹腔镜与胆道镜治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的疗效评价 [J]. 中国实用医药, 2021, 16 (20): 45-48. |
| [13] | 李金富, 邝敏棋, 张静. 腹腔镜下治疗胆囊结石的疗效分析 [J]. 中国城乡企业卫生, 2021, 36 (07): 162-164. |
| [14] | 李建龙. 腹腔镜下胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石临床效果观察 [J]. 中国药物与临床, 2021, 21 (08): 1320-1322. |
| [15] | 史冬雷，李莉主编；王青，胡英莉副主编. 北京协和医院门急诊健康教育手册 [M]. 北京: 中国协和医科大学出版社, 2019. 64-65. |
| [16] | 徐宏作. 腹腔镜胆囊切除手术治疗急性坏疽性胆囊炎患者的临床疗效及安全性 [J]. 医疗装备, 2022, 35 (16): 81-83. |
Join the Editorial Board
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsBecome a Reviewer
Scholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us