School of Social Development, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China
| Abstract: | The May Fourth Vernacular Movement has been called "the most dynamic legacy" of the May Fourth Movement, which officially declared "vernacular" to replace "literary" as the common language of society. It has always been a matter of great concern. This transformation of the language from the old to the new is not simply a linguistic issue, but is firmly engraved with the brand of society and culture, as well as a microcosm of the changing times, providing a window into the social transition between the old and the new in the first half of the twentieth century, or even the entire twentieth century. An examination of the occurrence, development, and impact of the vernacular literary movement can help reveal the true social impact of the Vernacular Movement and contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the May Fourth. Reading is a social phenomenon, and looking at the May Fourth Movement through the phenomenon of reading and exploring the socio-historical conditions under which the Vernacular Movement took place provides us with a path to touch history and enter the May Fourth Movement. The vernacular movement originated in the May Fourth New Culture Movement, and its momentum continued from the propositions and practices of the late Qing Dynasty. The vernacular movement in the late Qing Dynasty not only laid the foundation for the May Fourth vernacular movement in popularizing vernacular concepts, experimenting with styles, and creating vernacular creations, but also in preparing for the creation of audience groups and communication environments. At the same time, the prosperity of mass media and a considerable number of reading groups constituted the social and historical conditions for the development of vernacular writing and stimulated the development of the May Fourth vernacular movement. This movement established the use of the vernacular language, and its influence continues today and is still ongoing, as an important part of the transition of Chinese society from traditional to modern. |
| Keywords: | The May Fourth Vernacular Movement; The Late Qing Vernacular Movement; Social and Historical Conditions |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.ssrf.2022.01.003 |
| [1] | 朱志敏. 八十余年来国内五四运动研究 [J]. 中共党史研究, 2006 (02): 37-46. |
| [2] | 胡全章, 关爱和. 晚清与“五四”: 从改良文言到改良白话 [J]. 中国社会科学, 2018 (09): 159-175. |
| [3] | 高玉. 晚清白话文与五四白话文的本质区别 [J]. 文艺理论研究, 2019, 39 (05): 52-62. |
| [4] | 徐佳贵. 五四时期白话文运动的地方化——以无锡教育界为视域 [J]. 近代史研究, 2021 (04): 136-150. |
| [5] | 欧阳哲生编. 胡适文集(1) [M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1998: 333. |
| [6] | 李孝悌. 清末的下层社会启蒙运动: 1901-1911 [M]. 石家庄:河北教育出版社, 2001: 240-242. |
| [7] | 王汎森. 中国近代思想与学术的系谱 [M]. 长春: 吉林出版集团有限责任公司, 2010: 244. |
| [8] | 欧阳哲生编.胡适文集(3) [M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1998: 252. |
| [9] | [美]哈贝马斯. 公共领域的结构转型 [M]. 曹卫东, 译.上海:学林出版社, 1999: 218. |
| [10] | [美]安德森. 想象的共同体: 民族主义的起源于散布 [M]. 吴叡人, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2005: 32-33. |
| [11] | 丁文江、赵丰田编.梁启超年谱长编 [M]. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 1983: 661. |
| [12] | 汤文辉, 黄斌. 印刷术与文、白之争——白话文运动的媒介学分析 [J]. 浙江学刊, 2007 (04): 89-93. |
| [13] | 戈公振. 中国报学史 [M]. 上海: 上海古籍出版社, 2003: 237. |
| [14] | 中国社会科学院近代史所编. 五四运动回忆录(下)[M]. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 1979: 754. |
| [15] | 夏晓虹. 五四白话文学的历史渊源 [J]. 中国现代文学研究丛刊, 1985 (03): 22-41. |
| [16] | 罗志田. 权势转移: 近代中国的思想、社会与学术 [M]. 武汉: 湖北人民出版社, 1999: 235. |
| [17] | 莫芙卿: 《致陈独秀》,《新青年》2卷3号, 1916年11月1日. |
| [18] | [美]周策纵. 五四运动: 现代中国的思想革命 [M]. 周子平等, 译. 南京: 江苏人民出版社, 1996: 10. |
| [19] | [美]埃德加•斯诺. 红星照耀中国 [M]. 李方淮等, 译. 石家庄: 河北人民出版社, 1992: 111. |
| [20] | 全国政协商文史资料委员会办公室编. 五四运动亲历记[M]. 北京: 三联出版社, 1999: 56. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us