1. Changqing Drilling Company of CCDC, Xi’an 710000, China
2. SINOPEC Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd, Dezhou 253000, China
3. Shaanxi Province Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Reservoir Protection Technology of Oilfields, Xi’an Shiyou University, Xi’an 710065, China
| Abstract: | At present, the average drilling depth on land in China is over 3000 m. Drilling fluid with low viscosity, high yield value, high ratio of dynamic shear force and high temperature resistance are very critical for deep and ultra-deep wells. Low viscosity drilling fluid can generate less frictional resistance during circulation, thus reducing circulation energy consumption and circulation pressure loss. At the same time, drilling fluid require high yield value to effectively remove rock chips and maintain well wall stability. Low viscosity and high yield value drilling fluid can maintain stability under high temperature and pressure, and can be discharged from the borehole more quickly, reducing the erosion of the drilling fluid on the well wall and contamination of the formation. In view of the above requirements, low viscosity, high yield value drilling fluid additives have been widely studied at home and abroad, including nanoparticles, polymers, lignocellulose, salt and other types. This paper analyzes and compares the research status of these different types of treatment agents. Nanoparticles and lignocellulose were the most suitable for environmental protection and high temperature resistance, and outlooks the research direction of nano-mixed metal hydroxide, multi-positive gel instead of bentonite in drilling fluid base slurry and lignocellulose. |
| Keywords: | Drilling Fluid; Environmental Protection; High Temperature Resistance; Low Viscosity; High Yield Value |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.mater.2023.03.002 |
| 1. | 陕西省重点研发计划项目 (2023-YBGY-05) |
| 2. | 陕西省教育厅重点科学研究计划项目 (21JY035) |
| [1] | 王中华. 国内钻井液技术现状与发展建议 [J]. 石油钻探技术, 2023, 1-16. |
| [2] | 田文欣, 俞浩杰. 页岩储层高性能环保型水基钻井液体系及其环境影响评价 [J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30 (1): 38-43. |
| [3] | 邓虎, 贾利春. 四川盆地深井超深井钻井关键技术与展望 [J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42 (12): 82-94. |
| [4] | 张雁, 屈沅治, 张志磊, 等. 超高温水基钻井液技术研究现状及发展方向 [J]. 油田化学, 2022, 39 (3): 540-547. |
| [5] | 陈智晖, 夏海英, 李洪波, 等. 水基钻井液环境友好性评价标准研究及应用 [J]. 广东化工, 2022, 49 (15): 56-58. |
| [6] | 汪海阁, 黄洪春, 毕文欣, 等. 深井超深井油气钻井技术进展与展望 [J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41 (8): 163-177. |
| [7] | 吴彬, 向兴金, 张岩, 等. 深水低温条件下水基钻井液的流变性研究 [J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2006 (3): 12-13+19+82. |
| [8] | O'Brien D E, Martin E C. Stabilizing Sensitive Shales With Inhibited Potassium-Based Drilling Fluids [J]. J Pet Technol 25, 1973, 1089–1100. |
| [9] | Apos B. Stabilizing Sensitive Shales With Inhibited, Potassium-Based Drilling Fluids [J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1973, 25 (09), 1089-1100. |
| [10] | Du W C, Wang X Y, Shan W J, et al. Synthesis performance and inhibition mechanism of modified peanut shell nanocellulose as shale hydration inhibitor [J]. Polymer Bulletin, 2023, 80 (1), 263-277. |
| [11] | Lundberg. Ionomer Applications Including Ionic Elastomers and Polymer/Fluid Additives [J]. Structure and Properties of Ionomers, 1987, 429-438. |
| [12] | Thomas. Thermal Stability of Starch- and Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Based Polymers Used in Drilling Fluids [J]. Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal, 1982, 22 (02), 171-180. |
| [13] | 陈刚, 蔡丹, 张洁, 等. 羧酸多胺盐型黏土膨胀抑制剂制备与性能研究 [J]. 天然气与石油, 2014, 32 (2): 68-72+1. |
| [14] | Zhong H S, Wang H Z, Li G S. Feasibility analysis of coiled tubing drilling with supercritical carbon dioxide [J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2010, 37 (06), 743-747. |
| [15] | 杨志明. 钻井液在非开挖中的常规使用 [J]. 新疆有色金属, 2010, 33 (5): 31-32. |
| [16] | 周大宇. 聚合物钻井液的发展情况研究 [J]. 西部探矿工程, 2022, 34 (4): 91-92. |
| [17] | 胡伟民. 淀粉/木质素类钻井液高温处理剂的研究 [D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2018. |
| [18] | 刘振东, 贺伦俊, 李卉, 等. 钻井液纳米颗粒封堵性评价方法研究 [J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2019, 36 (02): 214-217. |
| [19] | 徐志勇. 高性能水基钻井液技术研究进展 [J]. 西部探矿工程, 2022, 34 (5): 76-77+79. |
| [20] | Burba J L, Holman W E, Crabb C R. Laboratory and field evalutions of novel inorganic drilling fluid additive, SPE 17198, the international association of drilling contractors the society of petroleum engineers (IADC SPE) drilling conference held in dallas, Texas, Feb. March 28, 1988. |
| [21] | 孙德军. Al-Mg MMH溶胶和钠土悬浮体的相互作用机理 [J]. 高等学校化学学报, 1996, 17 (9): 1428~1432. |
| [22] | 卫伟. 无机钻井液材料温度响应与机理研究 [D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2020. |
| [23] | 侯万国, 孙德军, 宋淑娥, 等. 氢氧化铝镁正电溶胶化学组成分析 [J]. 钻井液与完井液, 1995, 14 (6): 10-13. |
| [24] | 侯万国, 张春光, 孙德军, 等. 氢氧化铝镁正电溶胶制备及性能研究 [J]. 高等学校化学学报, 1995, 15 (8): 1292-1294. |
| [25] | 李发炎, 胡章文, 刘俊. 共沉淀法制备镁铝双金属氢氧化物及表征 [J]. 轻金属, 2013, 18 (6): 15-17. |
| [26] | 韩书华, 张春光, 侯万国, 等. 镁铝氢氧化物正电溶胶结构研究 [J]. 高等学校化学学报, 1996, 17 (11): 1785-1787. |
| [27] | 陈刚, 张洁, 张黎, 等. 聚糖-木质素钻井液处理剂作用效能评价 [J]. 油田化学, 2011, 28 (1): 4-8. |
| [28] | 张洁, 杨乃旺, 陈刚, 等. 钻井液处理剂氧化氨解木质素制备及性能评价 [J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 33 (02): 46-50. |
| [29] | 张洁, 李忠正. SFP木质素在钻井液中的作用效能 [J]. 纤维素科学与技术, 1997 (1): 48-53. |
| [30] | 张洁. 木质素钻井液添加剂 [J]. 西安石油大学学报 (自然科学版), 1990 (03): 60-64. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us