Institute of Higher Education, Anhui University, Hefei 230031, China
| Abstract: | Fostering the global competence of graduate students stands as a key strategy to enhance individual comprehensive quality and adapt to the ongoing trend of globalization, while also serving as a pivotal driver for societal advancement and international cooperation. This study delves into the core of global competence, establishing a framework and developmental pathway to enrich the global competence of graduate students. The aim is to encourage a localized interpretation of global competence and outline the objectives and paths for student development. Existing models for global competence incorporate a combination of elements, a fusion of stages and elements, and an emphasis on action. Expanding on these models, this research constructs a framework for graduate students' global competence across four key dimensions: knowledge, skills, attitudes and values, and actions. To excel at the knowledge level, individuals are encouraged to deeply explore their professional fields and adopt a global perspective; at the skills level, they should adjust to global changes and actively participate in cross-cultural communication and collaboration; in terms of attitudes and values, embracing global diversity and nurturing a sense of shared human destiny are crucial; and at the action level, active involvement in fostering a harmonious society and advancing research progress is deemed essential. However, prevailing challenges in graduate education include deficiencies in professional skills, a lack of international awareness, and limited global engagement. Consequently, this study proposes enhancing the professionalism of talent development in graduate education, fostering a multicultural environment, enhancing teachers' international competencies, and instilling a strong sense of agency in students. |
| Keywords: | Postgraduate Students; Global Competence; Cultivation Dilemma; Cultivation Path |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.edu.2024.02.005 |
| 1. | 安徽大学校级质量工程项目“国际视野下高校学生全球胜任力的发展现状和培养策略-以安徽大学为例” (2022xjjbgs016) |
| 2. | 安徽省社会科学创新发展研究课题“多措并举推进安徽省应用型人才培养研究” (2023CX159) |
| [1] | 中华人民共和国中央人民政府.关于加快和扩大新时代教育对外开放的意见[EB/OL]. (2020-06-18) [2024-03-09]. https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-06/18/content_5520156.htm |
| [2] | 中华人民共和国教育部. 2024年全国教育工作会议召开[EB/OL]. (2024-01-11) [2024-03-09]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/gzdt_gzdt/moe_1485/202401/t20240111_1099814.html |
| [3] | American Council on Education, Commission on International Education. Educating for global competence: America’s passport to the future [R]. Washington, D C: American Council on Education, 1998: 7. |
| [4] | US Department of Education. Succeeding Globally Through International Education and Engagement [R/OL]. https://www2.ed.gov/about/inits/ed/internationaled/international-strategy-2012-16.pdf. 2012-12. |
| [5] | 储昭卫. 新全球化背景下研究型大学本科生全球胜任力培养模式研究 [D]. 浙江大学, 2023. |
| [6] | Hunter, W. D. Knowledge, Skills, Attitudes, and Experiences Necessary to Become Globally Competent [D]. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University, 2004. |
| [7] | Deardorff, Darla K. and Elspeth Jones. The SAGE Handbook of International Higher Education [K]. SAGE Publications, 2012: 283-304. |
| [8] | Li Y. Cultivating Student Global Competence: A Pilot Experimental Study [J]. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 2013, 11(1): 125-143. |
| [9] | Liu Y, Yin Y, Wu R. Measuring graduate students' global competence: Instrument development and an empirical study with a Chinese sample [J]. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 2020, 100915 (67): 1-13. |
| [10] | 余韵寒, 吴昱江. 基于OBE理念的全球胜任力培养模式探索——以清华大学学生全球胜任力发展指导工作为例 [J]. 科学咨询(科技•管理), 2021, (07): 48-50. |
| [11] | 刘卓然. 国际交流经历对本科生全球胜任力的影响研究[D]. 南京大学, 2021. |
| [12] | U.S. Department of Education. Framework for Developing Global and Cultural Competencies to Advance Equity, Excellence and Economic Competitiveness.[EB/OL]. (2017-01-16) [2024.03.09]. https://www.globalizedc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Framework-for-Cultural-and-Global-Competency-Jan-2017.pdf |
| [13] | Kathryn Brantley Todd. Global competence survey development [D]. Kentucky: Doctoral Dissertation of University of Kentucky, 2017. |
| [14] | 邵亚琼. 师范生全球胜任力的现状调查及其提升研究 [D]. 江西师范大学, 2020. |
| [15] | Asia Society. Educating for Global Competence: Preparing Our Youth to Engage the World [R\OL]. http://asiasociety.org/files/book-globalcompetence.pdf (2011-06-01). |
| [16] | OECD. Global Competence for an Inclusive World [R]. https://www.deakin.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/968641/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf (2017-5-1\2020-5-14). |
| [17] | 维罗妮卡•博伊克斯•曼西利亚, 戴伟•威尔逊, 滕珺等. 全球胜任力在中国学校的新内涵及其实践 [J]. 比较教育学报, 2022, (04): 74-85. |
| [18] | 阳荣威, 胡陆英. 我国研究生教育“本科化”倾向及其应对措施 [J]. 研究生教育研究, 2014(01): 11-16. |
| [19] | 刘鸿. 我国研究生培养模式研究 [M]. 中国海洋大学出版社, 2007: 65. |
| [20] | 岑逾豪, 杨媛. 在地国际化: 硕士生全球胜任力培养的有效路径 [J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2022(07): 19-27. |
| [21] | 陈洪捷.专业学位研究生教育亟待加强“职业性”. [EB/OL](2019-12-16) [2024.03.09] http: /edu.people.com.cn/n1/2019/1216/c1053-31507808.html |
| [22] | 杜艳秋, 李莞荷, 王顶明. 全日制专业学位研究生实践教学存在的问题与对策——基于专家访谈结果的实证分析 [J]. 研究生教育研究, 2017, (02): 69-74. |
| [23] | 苏俊宏, 徐均琪, 吴慎将等.科研赋能教学模式下研究生创新能力培养的探索与实践 [J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2021(02): 36-39. |
| [24] | 高耀, 王洁, 许丹东等. 中国学术型硕士生的培养现状与问题——基于2021年全国硕士毕业生离校反馈调查的分析 [J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2022(08): 27-37. |
| [25] | 钱颖赟, 仇梁林. 国际化背景下地方综合性大学研究生教育现状研究 [J]. 中国成人教育, 2016, (02): 72-74. |
| [26] | 核心素养研究课题组. 中国学生发展核心素养 [J]. 中国教育学刊, 2016(10): 1-3. |
| [27] | 洪逸磊. 全球化背景下大学生国际意识教育研究 [D]. 江南大学, 2018. |
| [28] | 卜令朵. 研究生的跨国体验及其全球公民身份发展 [D]. 华东师范大学, 2013. |
| [29] | 吴玉程. 找准着力点切实提高研究生培养质量 [J]. 中国高等教育, 2023(17): 32-35. |
| [30] | 肖念, 关少化. 硕士生培养方案修订的几个关键点——以北京工业大学教育学硕士生培养方案为例 [J]. 学位与研究生教育, 2012(09): 27-30. |
| [31] | 刘宁宁. 本硕阶段学生创新能力培养体系衔接现状及其成效研究——基于1464名学术型硕士生的分析 [J]. 现代教育管理, 2019(01): 108-113. |
| [32] | 王婷婷, 向艳. 新时代高校校园文化育人的逻辑机理及路径优化 [J]. 江苏高教, 2024(01): 86-90. |
| [33] | Davide Parmigiani, Sarah-Louise Jones, Irma Kunnari & Elisabetta Nicchia. Global competence and teacher education programmes: A European perspective [J]. Cogent Education, 2022, 9(1): 1-17. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us