Faculty of Foreign Languages, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
| Abstract: | Technological psychological capital is the psychological capital that plays a key role in technological learning and plays a key role in individual technological mastery. In this paper, a qualitative case study has been conducted to describe the process and strategy of College English teachers’ educational technology learning, in order to explore the connotation and interactive relationship of their educational technology learning practice and strategy, and to clarify the specific evolution and construction mode of teachers’ individual technological psychological capital. The research finds that teachers have different learning strategies for their educational technology learning because of different personal backgrounds and specific situations, which makes teachers present different practical characteristics in the process of educational technology learning. College English teachers improve their technological psychological capital from the aspects of technical efficiency, technical hope, technical optimism and technical resilience through the practical strategies of technology request, technology use, technology understanding and technology transfer. Teachers’ own teaching-learning-research background, technical background, teaching-research environment, technical environment, and the technical learning support they can obtain are the main factors influencing the development of their technological psychological capital and the practical strategy of teachers’ technology learning. The research suggests that we should: 1) construct a transdisciplinary teacher education under the guidance of technology value; 2) construct the situation of using and requesting educational technology with education as the main position; 3) construct an ecological view of teaching and scientific research integrating education and technology to promote teacher’s technology education. This study explains the evolution and construction process of College English teachers’ educational technology learning and technological psychological capital, provides a new perspective and empirical data reference for teachers’ technology learning and teachers’ technology education. |
| Keywords: | Technological Psychological Capital; Educational Technology Learning; Teachers’ Technical Education; College English Teachers |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.edu.2022.02.009 |
| [1] | Johnson, K. E. & Golombek, P. R. (2003). “Seeing” teacher learning. TESOL Quarterly, 37, 729-737. |
| [2] | 王凯. (2011). 教师学习: 专业发展的替代性概念 [J]. 教育发展研究, (2), 58-61. |
| [3] | Shulman, L. S., & Shulman, J. H. (2004). How and what teachers learn: a shifting perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36 (2), 257-271. |
| [4] | 曾练武. (2010). 高校教师人力资源绩效管理存在的问题与优化对策分析 [J]. 现代大学教育, (3), 107-109. |
| [5] | 范梅, 曾宝成, 李君丽. (2006). 高校教师管理存在的问题与对策探讨 [J]. 现代大学教育, (3), 159-161. |
| [6] | Luthans, F., Yousef, C. M, & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. |
| [7] | 连榕. (2015). 专长发展与职业发展视域下的教师心理 [J]. 心理发展与教育, 31 (01), 92-99. |
| [8] | Goldsmith, A. H., Veum, J. R., & Darity, W. (1997). The Impact of Psy-chological and Human Capital on Wages. Economic Inquiry, 35, 815-829. |
| [9] | Judge, T. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). Dispositional affect and job satisfaction: A review and theoretical extension. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 67-98. |
| [10] | Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluation traits-self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability with job satisfaction and performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 14-25. |
| [11] | Jensen, S. M. (2003). Entrepreneurs as leaders: Impact of psychological capital and perceptions of authenticity on venture performance. Unpublished Dissertation of University of Nebraska. |
| [12] | Hosen, R., & Youssef, C. M. (2004). Human, Social, and Now Positive Psychological Capital Management: Investing in People for Competitive Advantage, Organizational Dynamics, 33, 143-160. |
| [13] | Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Smith, R. C. & Li, W. X. (2008). More Evidence on The Value of Chinese Workers’ Psychological Capital: A Potentially Unlimited Competitive Resource? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19, 818-827. |
| [14] | 赵辉. (2014). 试论高校教师心理资本的分析和开发[J].学校党建与思想教育, (18), 81-82+87. |
| [15] | 欧阳忠明, 任鑫, 田丽君. (2016). 新型职业农民心理资本与自我导向学习的关系 [J]. 现代远程教育研究, (06), 47-55. |
| [16] | 徐宛笑. (2015). 高校学生学习参与度与心理资本关系——基于华中科技大学的实证分析 [J]. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 0(6), 182-189. |
| [17] | 仲理峰, 王震, 李梅, 李超平.(2013).变革型领导、心理资本对员工工作绩效的影响研究 [J]. 管理学报, 10 (4), 536-544. |
| [18] | 李林英, 徐礼平. (2017). 重大科研项目团队心理资本维度及与创新绩效的关系 [J]. 科技进步与对策, 34 (20), 132-138. |
| [19] | 李力, 郑治国, 廖晓明. (2016). 高校教师职业心理资本与工作绩效: 社会支持的中介效应 [J]. 心理与行为研究, 14(06), 802-810. |
| [20] | 陈威燕, 李强, 王智宁. (2016). 基于创新行为中介作用的心理资本与科研绩效关系研究 .统计与决策 [J], (11), 102-105. |
| [21] | 关荐, 王平. (2015). 积极心理资本: 西部农村教师资源稳定的本源 [J]. 北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 0 (1), 93-95. |
| [22] | 毛晋平, 唐晨. (2015). 教师团队心理资本与成员组织公民行为的关系: 工作满意度的中介作用 [J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(04), 736-740. |
| [23] | 夏扉. (2017). 心理资本对教师职业倦怠影响研究——基于528名在岗教师的调研 [J]. 江西社会科学, 37 (07), 250-256. |
| [24] | 刘锦涛, 周爱保. (2016). 心理资本对农村幼儿教师工作投入的影响: 情绪调节自我效能感的中介作用 [J]. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(06), 1069-1073. |
| [25] | 熊猛, 叶一舵. (2014). 心理资本:理论、测量、影响因素及作用 [J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 32 (3), 84-92. |
| [26] | 徐礼平, 李林英. (2016). 团队心理资本:内涵、测量、作用机理与研究展望 [J]. 科技进步与对策, 33(23), 123-127. |
| [27] | 代静亚, 王中华. (2017). 心理资本对乡村好教师培育的价值与策略 [J]. 中小学教师培训, (11), 26-29. |
| [28] | 桑国元 .(2017). 教师作为学习者: 教师学习研究的进展与趋势 [J]. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (01), 142-148. |
| [29] | 陈向明. (2013). 从教师“专业发展”到教师“专业学习” [J]. 教育发展研究, (8), 1-7. |
| [30] | Williams, M. & Burden, R. (2000). Psychology for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| [31] | Meirink, J. A., Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N. & Bergen, T. C. M. (2009). Understanding teacher learning in secondary education: The relations of teacher activities to changed beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 89-100. |
| [32] | Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 67, 4-14. |
| [33] | Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108 (6), 1017-1054. |
| [34] | 钟亚尼. (2007). 协作的教师学习: 社会文化理论的视角. 卢乃桂等编. 中国教师的专业发展与变迁 [M]. 北京:教育科学出版. |
| [35] | 顾佩娅. (2009). 优秀外语教师成长案例研究 [M]. 北京: 外语教学与研究出版社. |
| [36] | 毛齐明, 蔡宏武. (2012). 教师学习机制的社会建构主义启示 [J]. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), (2), 19-25. |
| [37] | 张屹, 郝琪, 陈蓓蕾, 于海恩, 范福兰, 陈珍. (2019). 智慧教室环境下大学生课堂学习投入度及影响因素研究——以“教育技术学研究方法课”为例 [J]. 中国电化教育, (01), 106-115. |
| [38] | 景飞龙, 秦杰. (2019). 国外移动技术辅助语言学习研究热点与前沿的可视化探析 [J]. 中国远程教育, (01), 79-85. |
| [39] | 沈夏林, 邓倩, 刘勉. (2019). 智慧课堂学习体验: 技术赋能身体图式的唤起 [J]. 电化教育研究, 40 (09), 5-82. |
| [40] | 叶新东, 仇星月, 封文静. (2019). 基于虚拟现实技术的语言学习生态模型研究 [J]. 电化教育研究, 40 (02), 105-112+128. |
| [41] | 徐瑾劼, 朱雁. (2019). 信息技术支持学生自主学习的实证研究——基于TALIS2018上海数据结果的二次分析 [J]. 开放教育研究, 25 (04): 75-81. |
| [42] | 何聚厚, 梁瑞娜, 韩广欣, 肖鑫, 梁玉帅. (2019). 基于虚拟现实技术的深度学习场域模型构建研究 [J]. 电化教育研究, 40 (01), 59-66. |
| [43] | Creswell, J. W. 2013. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications. |
| [44] | Creswell, J. W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage. |
| [45] | 陈向明. (2000). 质的研究方法与社会科学研究 [M]. 北京:教育科学出版社. |
| [46] | 刘铁芳. (2006). 自我认识的提升与个体价值精神的超越——论当代教育中的价值引导 [J]. 高等教育研究, (12), 1-15. |
| [47] | 郑新民, 阮晓蕾. (2018). 外语教师学习共同体中的论文写作实践探究——以如何提升研究问题质量为例 [J]. 外语界, (4), 18-26. |
| [48] | 刘伟. (2017). 智慧教育:价值引导与实践操作的融合 [J]. 电化教育研究, 38 (06), 27-33. |
| [49] | 杨改学. (2006). 教育信息化进程中的反思 [J]. 电化教育研究, (3), 7-11. |
| [50] | 蔡旻君, 李小涛, 李芒. (2015). 教育技术生态观:目的、定位及意义 [J]. 中国电化教育, (11), 13-17+27. |
| [51] | 杨开城. (2005).中国教育技术学的尴尬 [J]. 中国电化教育, (12), 11-15. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us