School of Culture and Communication, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
| Abstract: | The temporal-aspectual system of the Qixian dialect, a Jin Chinese variety spoken in Shanxi Province, consists of two interrelated subsystems: a tense system and an aspect system, each exhibiting distinct yet overlapping grammatical functions. The tense system is tripartite, encoding past, present, and future temporal references through dedicated morphological and syntactic markers. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of these tense markers, elucidating their core grammatical functions while also demonstrating their secondary role in expressing modality, particularly in evidentiality and speaker attitude. The aspect system is further subdivided into dynamic and situational aspects, reflecting different dimensions of event structure. The dynamic aspect comprises four primary categories: perfective (denoting completed actions), durative (indicating ongoing states), experiential (marking past experiences), and continuative (expressing sustained or initiated actions). Notably, the continuative aspect bifurcates into inceptive (onset of an action) and persistive (continuation of a state) subcategories. Meanwhile, the situational aspect encodes four distinct event perspectives: the perfect (already realized), past experiential (formerly occurred), prospective (anticipated), and progressive (currently unfolding). A key finding of this study is the systematic interaction between tense and situational aspect in Qixian dialect, wherein grammatical markers frequently serve dual functions across these categories. This functional overlap suggests a tightly integrated temporal-aspectual framework, where tense distinctions often co-occur with aspectual nuances. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that aspectual markers exhibit greater syntactic flexibility than tense markers, allowing for pragmatic extensions into modal and discourse functions. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the grammaticalization pathways in Jin dialects and offer comparative insights into the broader typology of Chinese temporal-aspectual systems. |
| Keywords: | Shanxi Dialect; Qixian Dialect; Tense; Aspect |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.cll.2025.02.001 |
| [1] | 陈前瑞. 语法化与汉语时体研究 [M]. 上海: 学林出版社, 2017. |
| [2] | 戴耀晶. 现代汉语时体系统研究 [M]. 杭州: 浙江教育出版社, 1997. |
| [3] | 高翔. 现代汉语时体标记的浮现与变异 [D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2020. |
| [4] | 龚千炎. 汉语的时相时制时态 [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 1995. |
| [5] | 金立鑫. 试论行为类型、情状类型及其与体的关系 [J]. 语言教学与研究, 2008(4): 1-9. |
| [6] | 李小凡. 现代汉语体貌系统新探[C]//21世纪的中国语言学(一). 北京: 商务印书馆, 2004: 155. |
| [7] | 梁银峰. 汉语时体标记“了”“着”的语义演变方向 [J]. 南京师范大学文学院学报, 2023, (02): 12-21. |
| [8] | 刘博洋. 从地理类型学角度分析汉语方言短时体结构的语法特征[J]. 语言科学, 2023, 22 (02): 148-163. https://doi.org/10.7509/j.linsci.202108.034598 |
| [9] | 罗堃, 王菲. 西北五省区汉语方言时体研究的回顾与展望[J]. 甘肃高师学报, 2024, 29 (06): 37-42. |
| [10] | 史秀菊. 晋语盂县方言的时制系统 [J]. 太原师范学院学报 (社会科学版), 2012(2): 108-110. |
| [11] | 史秀菊. 山西方言语法研究 [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2023. 01. |
| [12] | 邢向东. 论晋语时制标记的语气功能——晋语时制范畴研究之一 [J]. 安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2015, 39 (04): 92-102. |
| [13] | 邢向东. 晋语的时制标记及其功能与特点——晋语时制范畴研究之三 [J]. 方言, 2020(1): 5-19. |
| [14] | 邢向东. 晋语和西部官话中表短时貌的语法手段[J]. 中国语文, 2021, (04): 441-455+511. |
| [15] | 尤越. 太原方言时体系统研究 [D]. 西安: 陕西师范大学, 2021. |
| [16] | 张赪. 后期近代汉语事态助词“来”的功能及演变 [J]. 中国语文, 2021, (06): 643-658+766. |
| [17] | 中国社会科学院语言研究所, 中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所, 香港城市大学语言资讯科学研究中心. 中国语言地图集•汉语方言卷 [M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us