A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Epidemic Prevention Slogans
School of Foreign Studies, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
| Abstract: | Language is the carrier of civilization, while urban health communication slogans offer a window into a city’s moral and ethical standards. During the COVID-19 pandemic and the post-pandemic era, some regions or social media platforms have witnessed uncivilized language use on health communication, which is detrimental to the construction of urban civilization in China. This article, based on Chen Xinren’s framework of critical discourse analysis, probes into the health communication slogans from the perspectives of interpersonal communication and language civilization, comparing and analyzing them in the early and post-epidemic periods. From the angle of critical discourse analysis, this article reveals the social roots of issues such as power inequality and violent constraints behind the discourse, and evaluates their effects in emotional transmission, interpersonal communication, and epidemic prevention mobilization. By criticizing and analyzing health slogans that frequently appeared in the early stages of the epidemic, characterized by "simplicity and brutality", and studying the new characteristics of slogans in the post-epidemic era compared to the early stages, as well as the effectiveness of epidemic management, we can optimize the discourse mode of health communication. Starting from both the central government and local government levels, it provides health communication slogan designers with the ideal civilized linguistic construction of promotional slogans, from programmatic documents at the central government level to the implementation of specific preventive measures at the local government level. For the former, it seeks to achieve a balance between ensuring the effectiveness of government’s epidemic prevention decisions and building a good government-citizen relationship; for the latter, it explores more legitimate, polite, down-to-earth, elegant, and appropriate ways of expressing localized language to promote the benign development of epidemic prevention and control and interpersonal linguistic civilization. |
| Keywords: | Health Communication Slogans; Critical Pragmatics; Interpersonal Discourse; Language Civilization |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.cll.2024.02.001 |
View:
Downloads:
Received: 30 January 2024
Accepted: 18 March 2024
Published Online: 18 March 2024
References
| [1] | 胡雨濛. “防疫”标语的健康动员: 话语策略、框架与权力结构 [J]. 国际新闻界, 2021, 43(05): 86-105. DOI: 10.13495/j.cnki.cjjc.2021.05.005. |
| [2] | 陈新仁. 批评语用学: 目标、对象与方法 [J]. 外语与外语教学, 2009, (12): 10-12. |
| [3] | KADAR D Z, HAUGH M. Understanding politeness [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. |
| [4] | SPENCER-OATEY H. Conceptualising the relational in pragmatics: Insights from metapragmatic emotion and (im) politeness [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011(43): 3565-3578. |
| [5] | 陈新仁. 言语交际者关系管理模式新拟 [J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2018,(03): 5-12. |
| [6] | 冉永平. 人际语用学视角下人际关系管理的人情原则 [J].外国语 (上海外国语大学学报), 2018, 41(04): 44-53+65. |
| [7] | 王振昆, 谢文庆. 语言美在社会生活中的作用 [J]. 语文研究, 1981, (02): 68-71. |
| [8] | 陈章太 & 于根元. 语言美和精神文明建设 [M]. 上海: 上海教育出版社, 1985. |
| [9] | 王春辉. 关于语言文字治理现代化的若干思考 [J]. 语言战略究, 2020, 5(06): 29-36. |
| [10] | 王春辉. 论语言与国家治理 [J]. 云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 52(03): 29-37. |
| [11] | 沈锡伦. 语言文明建设与法制观念 [J]. 语文建设, 1996, (12): 28-29. |
| [12] | 王玲, 陈新仁. 语言治理观及其实践范式 [J]. 陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2020, 49(05): 82-90. |
| [13] | 邹韶华. 论语言规范的理性原则和习性原则 [J]. 语言文字应用, 2004,(01): 16-25. |
| [14] | 李宇明. 语言规范试说 [J]. 当代修辞学, 2015,(04): 1-6. |
| [15] | 刘楚群. 当今语言规范观: 中和诚雅 [J]. 江西师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版), 2019, 52(06): 68-75. |
| [16] | 李玫莹. 论现代流行词的词汇特点及语用规范 [J]. 重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版), 2013,(12): 112-114. |
| [17] | 王心慰. 浅谈政府公共服务窗口语用规范——基于 (新) 格莱斯理论, 关联理论与礼貌原则 [J]. 考试周刊2014, (70): 21-22. |
| [18] | 陈新仁. 语用规范化与城市语言文明建设 [J]. 中国语言战略, 2022, 9(1): 2-11. |
| [19] | FOWLER R, HODGE B, KRESS G, et al. Language and control [M]. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979: 185-213. |
| [20] | 戴炜华, 陈宇昀. 批评语篇分析的理论和方法 [J]. 外语研究, 2004, (04): 12-16. |
| [21] | MEY J L. Across the abyss: The pragmatics-semantics interface revisited [J]. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2013, 10(3): 487-494. |
| [22] | VERSCHUEREN J. The pragmatic return to meaning: Notes on the dynamics of communication, degrees of salience, and communicative transparency [J]. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 1995, 5(2): 127-156. |
| [23] | 李华胤. 标语何以有效防疫: “责任性治理”的解释——以农村“硬核标语” 为分析对象 [J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 37(05): 62-73. |
| [24] | 姜子懿. 新冠疫情防疫宣传标语的语用特征探究 [J]. 汉字文化, 2022,(05): 80-84. |
Join the Editorial Board
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsBecome a Reviewer
Scholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us