School of Culture and Communication, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
| Abstract: | Ecological image is an important and indispensable aspect of multi-dimensional national image. Using discourse-historical approach as a theoretical framework and a self-constructed corpus, this paper conducts a discourse analysis of the reports on "carbon emission peak" and "carbon neutrality" in China Daily, aiming to explore the themes, intertextuality, and discourse strategies of China's ecological image self-invention discourse. The study found that China Daily elaborated six thematic contents around the "dual-carbon goal", but the intertextuality of the text is at a low level and needs to be deepened. The news adopts nomination strategies to strengthen self-identity and group identity and convey the idea of a community of ecological destiny for mankind; it adopts predication strategies to create a positive image by using positive words; and it adopts debate strategies to emphasize China's achievements in addressing ecological issues through figures and responsibility topics. Overall, China's foreign propaganda media have portrayed an image of a green, cooperative, innovative and responsible ecological power. |
| Keywords: | Discourse-Historical Approach; Ecological Discourse; National Image |
| DOI: | 10.57237/j.cll.2023.06.002 |
| 1. | 国家社科基金青年项目“汉语会话行为标注及自动识别研究” (项目编号: 20CYY021) |
| [1] | 胡开宝, 李鑫. 基于语料库的翻译与中国形象研究: 内涵与意义 [J]. 外语研究, 2017, 34(04): 70-75+112. |
| [2] | 何伟, 魏榕. 国际生态话语的内涵及研究路向 [J]. 外语研究, 2017, 34(05): 18-24. |
| [3] | 中国共产党新闻网. 新中国70年国家形象的建构 [EB/OL]. (2019-09-06). http://theory.people.com.cn/n1/2019/0906/c40531-31339676.html |
| [4] | 郭秀清, 杨学慧. 环境问题与中国国家形象的构建 [J]. 理论导刊, 2010(03): 105-107. |
| [5] | 李彦冰. 政治合法性、意识形态与国家形象传播 [J]. 现代传播 (中国传媒大学学报), 2012, 34(02): 70-72. |
| [6] | 刘继南, 何辉. 中国形象 [M]. 中国传媒大学出版社, 2006: 22. |
| [7] | 刘小燕. 关于传媒塑造国家形象的思考 [J]. 国际新闻界, 2002(02): 61-66. |
| [8] | 林予婷, 苗兴伟. 美国主流媒体对中国国家形象的话语建构——基于文本挖掘的历时研究 [J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2023, 46(03): 87-95. |
| [9] | 赵永华, 陆君钰. 新闻话语中的隐喻与国家形象的选择性建构——以《纽约时报》新冠肺炎疫情涉华报道为例 [J].当代传播, 2021, 221(06): 17-22. |
| [10] | 黄蔷.美国主流媒体对中国形象的话语偏见——以“新冠疫情”报道为例 [J]. 外国语文, 2021, 37(04): 85-96. |
| [11] | 申辰瑜, 郭继荣, 郭淼. 基于联合国气候变化大会的英国主流媒体涉华舆情研究 [J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(09): 113-119. |
| [12] | 王金波. “一带一路”与东南亚国家对中国的形象认知——根据GDELT大数据的实证研究 [J]. 南洋问题研究, 2023, (02): 73-89. |
| [13] | 连少英, 王清雨. People’s Daily对我国应对新冠疫情的报道研究 [J]. 青年记者, 2021(04): 53-55. |
| [14] | 刘曼. 新媒体语境下国家形象的多模态隐喻研究——以《人民日报》微信公众号疫情防控海报为例 [J]. 外语研究, 2022, 39(04): 23-28. |
| [15] | 王勇. “一带一路”背景下内陆边境自贸试验区国家文化形象建设研究 [J]. 广西民族研究, 2021(01): 100-107. |
| [16] | 刘明. 语料库辅助的中国生态形象建构研究 [J]. 现代外语, 2023, 46(01): 83-96. |
| [17] | 曹进, 杨明托. 基于及物性系统的网络新闻生态话语分析 [J]. 西北师大学报(社会科学版), 2022, 59(02): 136-144. |
| [18] | 陈琳琳. 中国形象研究的话语转向 [J]. 外语学刊, 2018, 202(03): 33-37. |
| [19] | 曹雨佳. 从气候会议看中国气候传播与环境形象建构——以2017年联合国气候会议波恩首轮谈判为例 [J]. 青年记者, 2017, 580(32): 86-87. |
| [20] | Reisigl, M. & R. Wodak. The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, London: Sage, 2016: 23-61. |
| [21] | Wodak, R. The discourse-historical approach [C]//R. Wodak & M. Meyer. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (1st edition), London: Sage, 2001: 63-94. |
| [22] | 李菁菁. 话语历史分析法与挪威国家形象构建——以挪威首相第70届和第71届联大演讲为例 [J]. 外国语文, 2017, 33(03): 61-66. |
| [23] | 胡春雨, 徐奕琳. 基于语料库的企业身份建构话语-历史研究 [J]. 现代外语, 2023, 46(04): 464-477. |
| [24] | 赵永刚. 媒体并购话语中的中国企业形象对比研究——一项语料库辅助的话语-历史分析 [J]. 解放军外国语学院学报, 2021, 44(01): 62-70. |
| [25] | 陈俊, 王蕾.国家形象构建视角下《中国日报》“一带一路”报道的话语分析 [J]. 传媒, 2020, 336(19): 78-81. |
| [26] | 景晶. 基于ALA“我爱我的图书馆员奖”文本分析的图书馆员职业认同提升研究 [J]. 图书馆学研究, 2022(03): 24-33. |
| [27] | Kristeva, J. Word, Dialogue and the Novel, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art [M]. New York: Columbia University, 1989: 37. |
| [28] | Fairclough, N. Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis [J]. Discourse & Society, 1992(2): 193-217. |
| [29] | Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change [M]. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992: 84-85. |
| [30] | 武建国, 徐嘉. 互文性策略与中国国家形象建构研究——以港珠澳大桥新闻报道为例 [J]. 中国外语, 2021, 18(06): 45-50. |
| [31] | 王立非, 李炤坤. 中美商务语篇互文性多维对比研究 [J]. 外语教学理论与实践, 2018(03): 56-62. |
| [32] | Shaw, P. & D. Pecorari. Types of intertextuality in Chairman's statements [J]. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 2013: 37-64. |
| [33] | Fairclough, N. L. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research [M]. New York: Routledge, 2003: 164. |
| [34] | 辛斌.批评话语研究中的互文性分析 [J]. 外语与外语教学, 2021, 318(03): 1-12+147. |
| [35] | 孙咏梅. 研究生导师组集体身份的话语建构研究——以导师组“我们”的使用为例 [J]. 外语与外语教学, 2013, 273(06): 11-14. |
| [36] | Zupnik, Y. A pragmatic analysis of the use of person deixis in political discourse [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1994, 21(4): 339-383. |
| [37] | 肖晞, 宋国新. 共同利益、身份认同与国际合作: 一个理论分析框架 [J]. 社会科学研究, 2020, 249(04): 125-133. |
We invite active, qualified and high profile scientists and researchers to join as Editorial Board Members.
Join UsScholars with a strong interest in reviewing are invited to join the reviewer panel to ensure the quality of the research to be published.
Join Us